linux-image-{generic,386} in -security uninstallable without -updates repository.

Bug #342638 reported by KarlGoetz
2
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
linux-meta (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

I've chatted with some people on -kernel and -motu about this, but in brief:

The linux-image packages in hardy depend on packages from -updates. I'm told this is a bug - hardy-security only is meant to be a supported use case.

Its definitely the case in hardy, and may be the case in intrepid.

This means its both impossible to build or install the packages from -security without enabling -updates.

Its personally annoying as its causing gNewSense issues (we dont want to do our next release until this is sorted out)

(as per first comment)
I believe this bug is blocked by bug #292381
I think its the actual cause of bug #333766

Tags: derivatives
Revision history for this message
KarlGoetz (kgoetz) wrote :

I believe this bug is blocked by #292381
I think its the actual cause of #333766

KarlGoetz (kgoetz)
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
KarlGoetz (kgoetz) wrote :

I /think/ I had the package wrong...

affects: linux (Ubuntu) → linux-meta (Ubuntu)
Revision history for this message
Kees Cook (kees) wrote :

Can you detail the actual error you're seeing? I can install linux-image-generic without problems on a machine with only -security enabled. bug 292381 should be fixed now since the compilers are identical.

Changed in linux-meta (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Kees Cook (kees) wrote :

e.g.:

ii linux-image-2.6.24-23-generic 2.6.24-23.48 Linux kernel image for version 2.6.24 on x86
ii linux-image-generic 2.6.24.22.24 Generic Linux kernel image

Revision history for this message
KarlGoetz (kgoetz) wrote : Re: [Bug 342638] Re: linux-image-{generic, 386} in -security uninstallable without -updates repository.

On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 16:15:24 -0000
Kees Cook <email address hidden> wrote:

> Can you detail the actual error you're seeing? I can install linux-
> image-generic without problems on a machine with only -security
> enabled. bug 292381 should be fixed now since the compilers are
> identical.
>

I'll have to test tomorrow (dont have an Ubuntu box handy).

http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=linux-image-generic and
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=linux-image-386
shows hardy and hardy-updates have different versions, and in both
cases -updates has a higher version.

https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta has the .24.24 stuck in
proposed.

Anyhow, I'll try it out soonish and post back.

Thanks,
kk

Revision history for this message
KarlGoetz (kgoetz) wrote :

I netinstalled a chroot and the packages installed in it fine. I havent go a host to install a 8.04.{1,0} install on to test if it works from earlyer setups atm.

Don't know if this question is related, but why is linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-23-generic not be in Hardy but it is in Hardy-Updates?

Revision history for this message
KarlGoetz (kgoetz) wrote :

This has been fixed in the last week (by copying the linux-image-* packages from -updates to security).
As the updates in the wild, i think fix released is correct? Hope so.

Changed in linux-meta (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.