Ubuntu 8.10 kills WinXP on SATA RAID array without warning.

Bug #333277 reported by hilbert
2
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Expired
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Installation environment: Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R motherboard with:

Intel ICH10R chipset.
Memory: 4GB

Drives configured as:
SATA-1 & SATA-2 ==> RAID (2 x 75GB) configured as Vol 0
SATA-3 ==> STD IDE, 1TB - unused/empty
SATA-4 ==> STD IDE, 1TB - unused/empty

Existing Software Configuration:

1. Windows XP already installed on SATA-1&2/RAID, formatted as FAT32, and configured to dual-boot with Win98 DOS.

2. Aim to put Ubuntu 8.10 on one or other spare/empty drives (but not on RAID Vol-0).

Results:

3. Ubuntu couldn't recognize the RAID drive/configuration.

4. Ubuntu gave no warning that it was about to attempt a write to an unknown configuration (even though it warned of the unrecognized drive(s)--displayed numerous errors).

5. The RAID configuration was destroyed (the WinXP &DOS partition damaged and the WinXP/DOS installation lost).

6. After the attempted Ubuntu installation, the RAID BIOS reported that [only] disk 0 RAID configuration was faulty.

Whilst nuking Windows installations appeals to my sensibility, I at least want to control the process. (Ubuntu gave no inkling that it was going to do so).

Similarly, on non-RAID Win/NTFS installations the Ubuntu partitioner also gives no warning (it implies it will install on the partition but it doesn't warn that everything on the partition will be destroyed*). Ubuntu's superlative ability to kill Windows without warning has led to a blanket ban on any Linux disks being allowed into my IT environment, Not a good way to win friends and influence people, let alone convert Windows users over to Ubuntu.

* Keep in mind that many Windows users are familiar with Linux installations that install on existing Windows/NTFS partitions without damaging them, thus they wrongly assume the Ubuntu partitioner is just preparing the existing partition for its installation (rather than destroying it and remaking a Linux one). Clearly, Ubuntu needs to issue dire warnings before destroying existing data.

P.S.: Despite having to select "I Don't Know" to the question about the version number (in order that this brain-dead form allow this bug to be submitted), the Ubuntu version number is 8.10 (reported in 'About'). It is the 32-bit version of a commercial double-sided disk (64-bit on the flipside) that came with a current issue of Linux Magazine.

Revision history for this message
Phillip Susi (psusi) wrote :

What options did you choose in the installer?

Changed in ubiquity (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

[Expired for ubiquity (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.]

Changed in ubiquity (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Expired
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.