#-sb-xc (progn ...) considered harmful in SBCL sources
Bug #327818 reported by
Tobias C. Rittweiler
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBCL |
Won't Fix
|
Low
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
M-. on sb-c::defknown brings you to the definition of DEFTRANFORM, so
a off-by-one.
This comes from the #-sb-xc (progn ...) a few forms above which is not
taken into account while compiler/
be taken account when Slime's re-reads the source.
So the idiom #-sb-xc (progn ...) as a toplevel form must be considered
harmful, and (progn #-sb-xc (progn ...)) should be used instead, or
something similiar.
This should probably be guarded against by some source-grovelling script.
(I think there is one already to guard against whitespacificat
Changed in sbcl: | |
importance: | Undecided → Low |
status: | New → Confirmed |
Changed in sbcl: | |
status: | Confirmed → Won't Fix |
To post a comment you must log in.