package amule-adunanza 3.14b3+2.2.2-0ubuntu0~upure64 failed to install/upgrade: tentata sovrascrittura di `/usr/share/locale/en_GB/LC_MESSAGES/adunanza.mo', che si trova anche nel pacchetto amule-adunanza-common

Bug #314491 reported by LucaWin
16
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
amule-adunanza (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: amule-adunanza

Description: Ubuntu 8.10
Release: 8.10
amule-adunanza:
  Installato: 3.14b3+2.2.2-0ubuntu0~upure64
  Candidato: 3.14b3+2.2.2-0ubuntu2~intrepid1
  Tabella versione:
     3.14b3+2.2.2-0ubuntu2~intrepid1 0
        500 http://archive.ubuntu.com intrepid-backports/universe Packages
 *** 3.14b3+2.2.2-0ubuntu0~upure64 0
        500 http://download.tuxfamily.org intrepid-upure64/main Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
The upgrade failed

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: amd64
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10
ErrorMessage: tentata sovrascrittura di `/usr/share/locale/en_GB/LC_MESSAGES/adunanza.mo', che si trova anche nel pacchetto amule-adunanza-common
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: amule-adunanza 3.14b3+2.2.2-0ubuntu0~upure64
SourcePackage: amule-adunanza
Title: package amule-adunanza 3.14b3+2.2.2-0ubuntu0~upure64 failed to install/upgrade: tentata sovrascrittura di `/usr/share/locale/en_GB/LC_MESSAGES/adunanza.mo', che si trova anche nel pacchetto amule-adunanza-common
Uname: Linux 2.6.27-11-generic x86_64

Revision history for this message
LucaWin (lucvinci) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Devid Antonio Filoni (d.filoni) wrote :

You are using a not official package. In order to install the official package you need to remove from your system amule-adunanza-common package. I'm marking this bug to Invalid.

Changed in amule-adunanza:
status: New → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Luca Falavigna (dktrkranz) wrote :

Gianvito, amule-adunanza is now in backports, mind removing or adjusting your local packages? Thanks ;)

Revision history for this message
Gianvito Cavasoli (janvitus) wrote :

Maybe my mistake, but my packages exist from gutsy...
Anyway, why you haven't created the amule-adunanza-common package? amule have it and Fastweb can have public ip, webserver files are included in amule-common.

Revision history for this message
Devid Antonio Filoni (d.filoni) wrote :

Gianvito: amule-adunanza-common doesn't provide the webserver, it's useless to have that package for a file...

Revision history for this message
Alessandro Scarozza (xan.scale) wrote :

gianvito, we have remove webserver from packages because webserver in amule adunanza, some times crash.

Revision history for this message
Gianvito Cavasoli (janvitus) wrote :

@ Devid: http://packages.ubuntu.com/intrepid/all/amule-common/filelist

@ Xan: personally never had a crash

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.