texmf-texlive/tex/latex/resume/res.cls seems to have incompatible license

Bug #313541 reported by Gavin McCullagh
14
This bug affects 3 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
texlive-base (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: texlive-base

Hi,

I regret to report that it appears texmf-texlive/tex/latex/resume/res.cls is neither DFSG nor GPL (nor by most other definitions) free software.

In particular "provided that the copies are not made or distributed for resale" seems to to contradict those licenses.

I don't know the author, but if you like I'll email him and see would he consider releasing under a compatible license.

Gavin

gavinmc@bambi:/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/resume$ head -20 res.cls
% RESUME DOCUMENT STYLE -- Released 23 Nov 1989
% for LaTeX version 2.09
% Copyright (C) 1988,1989 by Michael DeCorte

\typeout{Document Style `res' <26 Sep 89>.}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% res.sty
%
% \documentstyle{res}
%
% Copyright (c) 1988 by Michael DeCorte
% Permission to copy all or part of this work is granted, provided
% that the copies are not made or distributed for resale, and that
% the copyright notice and this notice are retained.
%
% THIS WORK IS PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" BASIS. THE AUTHOR PROVIDES NO
% WARRANTY WHATSOEVER, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THE WORK,
% INCLUDING WARRANTIES WITH RESPECT TO ITS MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS
% FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Revision history for this message
Norbert Preining (preining) wrote : Re: [Bug 313541] [NEW] texmf-texlive/tex/latex/resume/res.cls seems to have incompatible license

On Sa, 03 Jan 2009, gavinmc wrote:
> I regret to report that it appears texmf-
> texlive/tex/latex/resume/res.cls is neither DFSG nor GPL (nor by most
> other definitions) free software.

Thanks for the report. This file will be removed in upstream TeX Live
and the next packages in Debian within the next days. That will be in
texlive-extra 2007.dfsg.14-1 (if I count right).

Best wishes

Norbert

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <email address hidden> Vienna University of Technology
Debian Developer <email address hidden> Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GRINSTEAD (n.)
The state of a lady's clothing after she has been to powder her nose
and has hitched up her tights over her skirt at the back, thus
exposing her bottom, and has walked out without noticing it.
   --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff

Revision history for this message
Gavin McCullagh (gmccullagh) wrote :

Is there any sense asking the author to release under a better license. Is there a suitable license (eg one which is common in texlive and suits debian/ubuntu) we could suggest to him?

Gavin

Revision history for this message
Gavin McCullagh (gmccullagh) wrote :

Ah. Neither email address seems to have an mx record so I guess we may be out of luck.

There seems to be a reference to him as Michael Decorte (Nunez), on classmates.com, but I've no account on it.

Gavin

Revision history for this message
Gavin McCullagh (gmccullagh) wrote :

Hi Norbert,

I registered for an account on classmates and left a message for Michael DeCorte, the original author. He responded today to say:

--------------------------------
From: Michael DeCorte <.....................>
Subject: res.sty
To: Gavin McCullagh <.....................>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:15:27 -0800 (PST)

Gavin,

I am the original author of res.sty from 20 years ago. If it's of value to anyone that's great. However, I no longer have a copy of res.sty and to the best of my knowledge there is no official copy anywhere, I can't exactly publish a copy with an updated license. I have no issues if the license is updated to GPL http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html

Michael DeCorte
--------------------------------

So, it appears we can get it re-licensed. Would GPL be a suitable license for it to go into the upstream TeX tree? If not, can you suggest a more suitable one, and a list to which he can email a new version to get it updated in their tree. Once he publicly releases it, you can update your TeX Live packages with the new version and we won't lose the package.

Gavin

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in texlive-base (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.