Ubuntu
kdbg package

merge request for kdbg

Bug #313137 reported by Bhavani Shankar on 2009-01-02

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	kdbg (Ubuntu)	Fix Released	Wishlist	Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: kdbg

Debian has a new version to be merged.

Related branches

lp:ubuntu/karmic/kdbg

Revision history for this message

Bhavani Shankar (bhavi) wrote on 2009-01-02:

Debian > ubuntu diff Edit (4.0 KiB, text/plain)

Changed in kdbg:
status:	New → Confirmed

Steve Stalcup (vorian) on 2009-01-02

Changed in kdbg:
assignee:	nobody → vorian
importance:	Undecided → Wishlist
status:	Confirmed → In Progress

Revision history for this message

Steve Stalcup (vorian) wrote on 2009-01-02:

Thanks so much for your work on this merge.

This package is lagging behind the kde development curve, and really shouldn't be merged.
kdbg (upstream) needs to update their package, this can become a request for removal from the archive.

I am unsubscribing u-u-s, and subscribing the archive admins to remove this package.
Thanks!

Changed in kdbg:
assignee:	vorian → nobody
status:	In Progress → Won't Fix
status:	Won't Fix → Confirmed

Revision history for this message

Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote on 2009-01-02: Re: Request removal for kdbg

This bug was fixed in the package kdbg - 2.1.1-1ubuntu1

---------------
kdbg (2.1.1-1ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low

  [ Bhavani Shankar ]
  * Merge from debian unstable, remaining changes: (LP: #313137)
    + debian/rules:
      - added dh_icons
  * Add dh-installmime

  [ Steve Stalcup ]
  * Bumped standards version to 3.8.0
  * Bumped debhelper build deps to (>= 5.0.51~)

-- Steve Stalcup <email address hidden> Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:09:45 -0500

Changed in kdbg:
status:	Confirmed → Fix Released

Revision history for this message

Steve Stalcup (vorian) wrote on 2009-01-02:

After some discussion with some others on the kubuntu team, I wen't a head and did this merge!

Thanks very much for your contribution!

In the future, please correct any lintian errors or warnings you see. In this case, the build deps on dephelper needed to be bumped, and the standards version as well.

@ubuntu-archive: please disregard the removal request.