Evince should centralize Ebooks in two page mode
Bug #308174 reported by
TM8471
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evince |
Expired
|
Wishlist
|
|||
| evince (Ubuntu) |
Triaged
|
Wishlist
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
Binary package hint: evince
I use evince in two page mode as an ebook viewer. Most ebook have a broad rim. I can't cut out this useless rim in two page mode, and consequently, both double pages are shifted to the right side. I can correct this by using the stroke keys, but every time I scroll to the next double page, the ebook is shifted to the right side once again. That is enervating!
It would make much more sense, if evince could centralice the ebook! This would make evince much better for ebook reading.
| Changed in evince: | |
| importance: | Undecided → Wishlist |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
Revision history for this message
| Pedro Villavicencio (pedro) wrote | #2 |
| Changed in evince: | |
| assignee: | nobody → desktop-bugs |
| Changed in evince: | |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
Revision history for this message
| Martin Mai (mrkanister-deactivatedaccount-deactivatedaccount) wrote | #4 |
| Changed in evince: | |
| importance: | Undecided → Unknown |
| status: | Confirmed → Unknown |
| Changed in evince: | |
| status: | Unknown → New |
| Changed in evince: | |
| status: | Confirmed → Triaged |
| Changed in evince: | |
| importance: | Unknown → Wishlist |
| Changed in evince: | |
| status: | New → Invalid |
| Changed in evince (Ubuntu): | |
| assignee: | Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) → nobody |
| Changed in evince: | |
| importance: | Wishlist → Unknown |
| status: | Invalid → Unknown |
| Changed in evince: | |
| importance: | Unknown → Wishlist |
| status: | Unknown → Confirmed |
| Changed in evince: | |
| status: | Confirmed → Expired |
To post a comment you must log in.
Dimitrios, may you please add a comment when you do a change to a bug report? having bugs confirmed with no comments about the change isn't very good. This needs to be send upstream anyways, creating an empty upstream task for now so we don't forget about this. thanks.