"Image:" text is redundant with colouring

[GreenReaper]

An Image: link is coloured purple. There is no real need for the text "Image:" at the front of it, unless we consider colourblind users (and even they could probably deduce it from the name and the .png at the end). There is also a space between the filename and the filetype.

[Benjamin Thyreau (benji2)]

Hi,
As i tested both with and without, i considered it was more user-friendly to display it. Especially considering the large total volume of text, and the fact that it might not be immediately obvious (despite the color scheme) that a textflow-breaking image belongs here, as wikipedia authors don't have the non-image mode in thought when authoring.
Setting an option for that might be overkill, but if you really want to drop the "Image:" keyword, you can edit dumpReader.py and change "<h2>(Image: \\1)</h2>" to "<h2>(\\1)</h2>" (around line 443)
Hope it helps

[GreenReaper (greenreaper)]

OK; I guess it could be Media: as well. Thanks for the tip!