glossaries package not included with texlive

Bug #296320 reported by Alaak
30
This bug affects 4 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
texlive-base (Ubuntu)
Incomplete
Medium
spilpan

Bug Description

Altough it is stated to be with texlive by CTAN, glossaries package is not included when I install texlive under XUbuntu 8.10. When compiling a file including the command \usepackage{glossaries} I get the error:
! LaTeX Error: File `glossaries.sty' not found.

Exactly the same file compiles fine using TeXnicCenter and Miktex under Windows XP.

At first I tried to find an ubuntu package that includes the latex package via synaptic. As this was not successful I installed the complete texlive distribution "texlive-full". However it was nowhere inside and I still got the error that the package was not available.

So I tried to install the package manually by copying it to "/usr/local/share/texmf/tex/latex" and "~/texmf/tex/latex" and running sudo texhash. This did not work either.

I think there should be an ubuntu package including this latex package so it is installabel using synaptic.

Tags: latex missing
Revision history for this message
Charlie Kravetz (cjkgeek) wrote :

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This bug did not have a package associated with it, which is important for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper developers. You can learn more about finding the right package at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage . I have classified this bug as a bug in texlive-base.
For future reference you might be interested to know that a lot of applications have bug reporting functionality built in to them. This can be accessed via the Report a Problem option in the Help menu for the application with which you are having an issue. You can learn more about this feature at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs.

Revision history for this message
Charlie Kravetz (cjkgeek) wrote :

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we can't fix it because your description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful to read "How to report bugs effectively" http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html. We'd be grateful if you would then provide a more complete description of the problem.

At a minimum, we need:
1. the specific steps or actions you took that caused you to encounter the problem,
2. the behavior you expected, and
3. the behavior you actually encountered (in as much detail as possible).
4. the specific name of the package you installed and the version of the package (which you can find using apt-cache policy PACKAGE_NAME in a terminal

Thanks!

Changed in texlive-base:
status: New → Incomplete
Alaak (alaak-gmx)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Charlie Kravetz (cjkgeek) wrote :

Note: Alaak replied by changing the entire description instead of commenting.

Thanks for replying, but can you give the version of the package also? You can find the version using apt-cache policy PACKAGE_NAME in a terminal and copying the results and pasting in a comment here.

Revision history for this message
lherrmann (lherrmann) wrote :

This bug is still valid with the current version of texlive-[base|full] (version 2007.dfsg.1-2)

Revision history for this message
Charlie Kravetz (cjkgeek) wrote :

Thanks for reporting this bug and any supporting documentation. Since this bug has enough information provided for a developer to begin work, I'm going to mark it as confirmed and let them handle it from here. Thanks for taking the time to make Ubuntu better!

Changed in texlive-base:
importance: Undecided → Medium
status: Incomplete → Triaged
Revision history for this message
aquatix (h-launchpad-aquariusoft-org) wrote :

Any news on this? I ran into the same issue on both 8.10 and 9.04 beta.

Revision history for this message
AndreasTIII (and-reastropschug) wrote :

Same here. The tex-package "glossary" is in the base distribution but it was marked as obsolete. It is replaced by "glossaries" according to this source: http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/glossaries/#jhe4eb329834da3d36278b1b7d943b3bc9

Error description:

pdflatex: "glossaries.sty" not found
(pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (Web2C 7.5.6))

locate does not find glossaries.sty, so I think it is simply not included.

the ubuntu "glosstex" package however, seems to close this loophole at least functionality wise.
However, since "glossar" is obsolete now, it would seem prudent to include the new "glossaries" package in the texlive distribution.

Revision history for this message
Holger Krause (holger-krause) wrote :

From http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=jaunty&section=all&arch=any&lang=de&searchon=contents&keywords=glossary.sty it seems that the tex-package "glossary" is part of the package "texlive-latex-extra".
Shouldn't the tex-package "glossaries" also belong to the package "texlive-latex-extra"?

Revision history for this message
KmbH (matthias-hesse) wrote :

I agree with Holger. glossaries should be part of the "texlive-latex-extra" packet. I guess glossaries is a kind of "advanced" latex and belongs more to extra than base. It also would be good to have the old version (glossary) and the new (glossaries) in one package.

glossaries depends on the latex package xfor http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/xfor/ which is not included in my texlive-latex-extra (2007.dfsg.8-1ubuntu1) or base (2007-dfsg.1-5) installation. It would make sense to also include xfor in texlive-latex-extra.

Revision history for this message
Norbert Preining (preining) wrote : Re: [Bug 296320] Re: glossaries package not included with texlive

On Mi, 07 Okt 2009, KmbH wrote:
> I agree with Holger. glossaries should be part of the "texlive-latex-
> extra" packet. I guess glossaries is a kind of "advanced" latex and

And it will be in the packages of TL 2009.

If some Ubuntu guys could help testing, there are preliminary packages
available at
 deb http://people.debian.org/~preining/TeX/ tl2009-pre/
 deb-src http://people.debian.org/~preining/TeX/ tl2009-pre/
that would help a lot for getting it real soon.

Best wishes

Norbert

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining Associate Professor
JAIST Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology <email address hidden>
Vienna University of Technology <email address hidden>
Debian Developer (Debian TeX Task Force) <email address hidden>
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BOSCASTLE
A huge pyramid of tin cans placed just inside the entrance to a
supermarket.
   --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff

Revision history for this message
Berteun (berteun) wrote :

The preliminary packages do not permit an easy install of texlive-full in Ubuntu karmic because it depends on context and context in turn depens on tex-gyre which is not going to be installed because it's nowhere in the Ubuntu repositories, only debian sid has it.

spilpan (spilpan)
Changed in texlive-base (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → spilpan (spilpan)
Revision history for this message
Logan Rosen (logan) wrote :

It appears that glossaries.sty exists in texlive-latex-extra in Lucid, Precise, Quantal, and Raring [1]. Can you please try installing that package in one of the currently-supported Ubuntu versions and seeing if it fixes your issue?

[1] http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=glossaries.sty&mode=exactfilename&suite=raring&arch=any

Changed in texlive-base (Ubuntu):
status: Triaged → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Alaak (alaak-gmx) wrote :

Hi,

I will check. I hope I still have the document from that time somewhere around. If I just include \usepackage{glossaries} in a document I am currently working on it seems to work.

Revision history for this message
MG (mmd-coding) wrote :

Installing texlive-latex-extra seems to solve the problem.

Ubuntu 12.04
texlive-latex-extra 2009-10ubuntu1

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.