acpi sbs module incorrected named in resume scripts

[Lethe]

Please refer:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=447085

This is indeed correct. /etc/acpi/resume.d/72-acpi-pain.sh modprobes acpi_sbs, which is incorrect - the module is called 'sbs'

Patch attached (using Intrepid, 2.6.27)

Nick

--- resume.d/72-acpi-pain.shOLD 2008-11-08 08:06:35.000000000 +0000
+++ resume.d/72-acpi-pain.sh 2008-11-08 08:07:01.000000000 +0000
@@ -25,11 +25,11 @@
 done

 # Make sure that the drive power state is set correctly again
-modprobe -r acpi_sbs
+modprobe -r sbs
 modprobe -r ac
 modprobe ac
 modprobe -r battery
 modprobe battery
-modprobe acpi_sbs
+modprobe sbs
 /etc/acpi/power.sh

[Steve Langasek (vorlon)]

Hello,

What is the practical problem caused for you by this bug? acpi-support suspend/resume handling is not used at all by default on intrepid, in favor of pm-utils, and these scripts should probably be eliminated rather than worrying about fixing up wrong module names.

[Lethe (nick-ukfsn)]

Because I use Fluxbox desktop, and call these scripts to suspend/resume etc. If they are wrong it doesn't work, and if they are not there then people with similar set-up cannot use them.

Nick

[xteejx (xteejx-deactivatedaccount)]

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We are sorry that we do not always have the capacity to look at all reported bugs in a timely manner.
There have been many changes in Ubuntu since that time you reported the bug and your problem may have been fixed with some of the updates. It would help us a lot if you could test the current Ubuntu version (10.04). If you can test it, and it is still an issue, we would appreciate if you could upload updated logs by running apport-collect <bug #>, and any other logs that are relevant for this particular issue.

[Steve Langasek (vorlon)]

In fact, the resume.d scripts have been entirely obsoleted now for several releases, and dropped entirely from the acpi-support package. So this issue as described is fixed.

There is also no module in the kernel in 10.04 LTS named 'sbs', so there doesn't appear to be anything else that needs to be added to another package for this.