bluez-pin: please rebuild against unstable's dbus

Bug #28407 reported by Debian Bug Importer
4
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
bluez-pin (Debian)
Fix Released
Unknown
bluez-pin (Ubuntu)
Invalid
High
Unassigned

Bug Description

Automatically imported from Debian bug report #347394 http://bugs.debian.org/347394

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:51:13 +0100
From: Filippo Giunchedi <email address hidden>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <email address hidden>
Subject: bluez-pin: please rebuild against unstable's dbus

Package: bluez-pin
Severity: wishlist

Hi Phil,
dbus 0.60 just hitted unstable, could you please rebuild bluez-pin
against it? I'm it is possibile to ask for automatic rebuilds (appending
+b1 to debian revision) although I don't where to do such a request!

filippo

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-bytemark-uml-20040706-1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:26:21 +0100
From: Achim Bohnet <email address hidden>
To: Filippo Giunchedi <email address hidden>,
 <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#347394: bluez-pin: please rebuild against unstable's dbus

On Tuesday 10 January 2006 14:51, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> Package: bluez-pin
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi Phil,
> dbus 0.60 just hitted unstable, could you please rebuild bluez-pin
> against it? I'm it is possibile to ask for automatic rebuilds (appending
> +b1 to debian revision) although I don't where to do such a request!

You have request it on <email address hidden>.
I assume you already verified that a rebuild in enough ;)

Achim
--
  To me vi is Zen. To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is
  a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated.
  You discover truth everytime you use it.
                                      -- <email address hidden>

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:18:06 +0100
From: Filippo Giunchedi <email address hidden>
To: Achim Bohnet <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#347394: bluez-pin: please rebuild against unstable's dbus

--lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 06:26:21PM +0100, Achim Bohnet wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 January 2006 14:51, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> > Package: bluez-pin
> > Severity: wishlist
> >=20
> > Hi Phil,
> > dbus 0.60 just hitted unstable, could you please rebuild bluez-pin
> > against it? I'm it is possibile to ask for automatic rebuilds (appending
> > +b1 to debian revision) although I don't where to do such a request!
>=20
> You have request it on <email address hidden>.
> I assume you already verified that a rebuild in enough ;)

nice guess, I think 0.30 needs to be uploaded to unstable for newer dbus to=
 work

filippo
--
Filippo Giunchedi
PGP key: 0x6B79D401
random quote follows:

Endian little hate we
-- Anonymous (?)

--lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDxCSOABzeamt51AERAqkAAJ9LqGIlaCjyQnCjSc9MJ+heX//qaQCfQdz2
jbeMzHmJeHxo+eHOMXXutYQ=
=ELCq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ--

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:26:36 +0100
From: Laurent Bonnaud <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#347394: bluez-pin: please rebuild against unstable's dbus

> nice guess, I think 0.30 needs to be uploaded to unstable for newer
> dbus to work

Indeed, I got confirmation from Steve Langasek. Since bluez-pin is not
installable in sid at the moment, I'm raising the severity of this bug.

--
Laurent Bonnaud.
http://www.lis.inpg.fr/pages_perso/bonnaud/

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:27:11 +0100
From: Laurent Bonnaud <email address hidden>
To: Debian BTS control <email address hidden>
Subject: severity 347394 grave

severity 347394 grave
thanks

--
Laurent Bonnaud.
http://www.lis.inpg.fr/pages_perso/bonnaud/

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:37:14 -0500
From: Filipus Klutiero <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Fixed in 0.30-2

This should have been fixed by an erroneous changelog entry in 0.30-2.

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :

Only an issue with the Debian build

Changed in bluez-pin:
status: Unconfirmed → Rejected
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.