xml parsing error in thunderbird due to agenda/calendar extention

[mpaq]

Binary package hint: thunderbird

1) UBUNTU 8.04.1
2) Tunderbird 2.0.0.16+nobinonly
3) lightning-extension 0.7

On heach action ("A propos de Thunderbird", Preferences, loading of a mail attachment,...)
I've got some of the following messages:

Erreur d'analyse XML : entité non définie
Emplacement : chrome://mozapps/content/downloads/downloads.xul
Numéro de ligne 14, Colonne 1 :<window
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
^

or:

Erreur d'analyse XML : erreur dans le traitement d'une référence
d'entité externe
Emplacement : chrome://messenger/content/aboutDialog.xul
Numéro de ligne 9, Colonne 1 :%brandDTD;
^

After full de-installation of the "lightning-extension" package, every thing was working again perfectly.

Rem: This extension was installed 3 or 4 months ago and everything was working, the problem appears only after the last thunderbird update.

Best regards

MPQ

[mpaq (mipaquet)]

The problem seems, for me, to be the same for those 3 additional "Bugs reports"

[Alexander Sack (asac)]

mpaq wrote:
> The problem seems, for me, to be the same for those 3 additional "Bugs
> reports"
>
>
>
which bugs are you referring to?

[mpaq (mipaquet)]

Alexander Sack a écrit :
> mpaq wrote:
>> The problem seems, for me, to be the same for those 3 additional "Bugs
>> reports"
>>
>>
>>
> which bugs are you referring to?
>
The one listed in the xml.png in annex of my precedent mail.
#203202
#229536
#274797

Best regards

Mpq

[mpaq (mipaquet)]

After trying version 0.9 of lightning-extension on Thunderbird 2.0.0.23
No XML errors any more

Bug fixed....

Best regards

Mpq

[Micah Gersten (micahg)]

This bug report is being closed due to your last comment regarding this being fixed with an update. For future reference you can manage the status of your own bugs by clicking on the current status in the yellow line and then choosing a new status in the revealed drop down box. You can learn more about bug statuses at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status . Thank you again for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please submit any future bugs you may find.

[mpaq (mipaquet)]

Micah Gersten a écrit :
> This bug report is being closed due to your last comment regarding this
> being fixed with an update. For future reference you can manage the
> status of your own bugs by clicking on the current status in the yellow
> line and then choosing a new status in the revealed drop down box. You
> can learn more about bug statuses at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status
> . Thank you again for taking the time to report this bug and helping to
> make Ubuntu better. Please submit any future bugs you may find.
>
> ** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu)
> Status: Fix Committed => Invalid
>
OK, I've try to be coherent but I was'nt: this was not a "Fixed
committed" but a "Fixed realease". Why did you placed it as "Invalid"?
Thit was a real bug. Confirmed by other users.
It was fixed (And that's the more important thing, I agree), but I don't
see it as "invalid".
Some people could use old versions of UBUNTU....

Best regards

Mpq

[Micah Gersten (micahg)]

@Mpq

Invalid means closed also. Fix Released is a fix has been released that has been confirmed was a bug in the source code or packaging.
Please see this link for more information:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status

[mpaq (mipaquet)]

Michel a écrit :
> Micah Gersten a écrit :
>> This bug report is being closed due to your last comment regarding this
>> being fixed with an update. For future reference you can manage the
>> status of your own bugs by clicking on the current status in the yellow
>> line and then choosing a new status in the revealed drop down box. You
>> can learn more about bug statuses at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status
>> . Thank you again for taking the time to report this bug and helping to
>> make Ubuntu better. Please submit any future bugs you may find.
>>
>> ** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu)
>> Status: Fix Committed => Invalid
>>
> OK, I've try to be coherent but I was'nt: this was not a "Fixed
> committed" but a "Fixed realease". Why did you placed it as "Invalid"?
> Thit was a real bug. Confirmed by other users.
> It was fixed (And that's the more important thing, I agree), but I don't
> see it as "invalid".
> Some people could use old versions of UBUNTU....
>
> Best regards
>
> Mpq
>
>
OK, if You want, I don't want to spend time with that...
But reading the definition of "Invalid", I'm, definitely, not agree with
you.
Don't spent time to replay, It's OK like that.
You're doing a wonderful job there, and that is important.

Best regards

MPq

[mpaq (mipaquet)]

Micah Gersten a écrit :
> @Mpq
>
> Invalid means closed also. Fix Released is a fix has been released that has been confirmed was a bug in the source code or packaging.
> Please see this link for more information:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status
>
OK, if You want, I don't want to spend time with that...
But reading the definition of "Invalid", I'm, definitely, not agree with
you.
Don't spent time to replay, It's OK like that.
You're doing a wonderful job there, and that is important.

Best regards

MPq