v86d crashed with SIGSEGV

Bug #258031 reported by Teräslilja
16
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
v86d (Debian)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
v86d (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: v86d

1)
Description: Ubuntu intrepid (development branch)
Release: 8.10

2) 0.1.5-1ubuntu2

3) normal login

4) v86d crashed

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: amd64
CrashCounter: 1
Dependencies:
 libgcc1 1:4.3.1-8ubuntu3
 gcc-4.3-base 4.3.1-8ubuntu3
 findutils 4.4.0-2ubuntu3
 libc6 2.8~20080505-0ubuntu6
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10
ExecutablePath: /sbin/v86d
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: v86d 0.1.5-1ubuntu2
ProcAttrCurrent: unconfined
ProcCmdline: /sbin/v86d
ProcEnviron: PATH=/sbin:/bin
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: v86d
StacktraceTop:
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
Title: v86d crashed with SIGSEGV
Uname: Linux 2.6.26-5-generic x86_64
UserGroups:

Revision history for this message
Teräslilja (m-matti-a-lehtonen) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Symbolic stack trace

StacktraceTop:?? ()
?? ()
?? ()
?? ()
?? ()

Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Symbolic threaded stack trace
Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please try to obtain a backtrace following the instructions at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash and upload the backtrace (as an attachment) to the bug report. This will greatly help us in tracking down your problem.

Changed in v86d:
importance: Undecided → Medium
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Christian Roessner (christian-roessner-net) wrote :

I hope I can confirm this bug (Not sure, if it is the same bug). After installing v86d, recreating the initramfs and rebooting, my pc speaker started making a lot of beeps. The screen kept black and after I logged into my gnome session, I found this in dmesg:

[ 1.980092] v86d[1094]: segfault at 0 ip 0000000000402069 sp 00007fff35237eb0 error 4 in v86d[400000+1a000]
[ 2.751750] Program usplash tried to access /dev/mem between 0->e00000.
[ 6.812016] uvesafb: Getting VBE info block failed (eax=0x4f00, err=1)
[ 6.812019] uvesafb: vbe_init() failed with -22
[ 6.812023] uvesafb: probe of uvesafb.0 failed with error -22

No idea, how to backtrace this.

Revision history for this message
Christian Roessner (christian-roessner-net) wrote :

What about the newer version at:

http://dev.gentoo.org/~spock/projects/uvesafb/

Revision history for this message
Roman Yepishev (rye) wrote :

Appeared after trying to fix #246269

Acer Aspire 5520, nVidia GeForce 8400M G, 32 bit Ubuntu Intrepid (current):
Even when no kernel parameters are passed, the screen becomes blank after passing GRUB until GDM starts.
v86d is installed and present in initramfs.

dmesg:

[ 3.282132] v86d[1018]: segfault at 0 ip 08049cd1 sp bfb630c0 error 4 in v86d[8048000+17000]
...
[ 7.657022] uvesafb: Getting VBE info block failed (eax=0x4f00, err=1)
[ 7.657030] uvesafb: vbe_init() failed with -22
[ 7.657040] uvesafb: probe of uvesafb.0 failed with error -22

v86d is the only segfaulted application during startup.

After switching back to ttys from X i get extremely stretched terminal font in 40x24 mode.

Any idea how to emulate v86d kernel call after the boot process?

Revision history for this message
iponeverything (cookema) wrote :

I hope that it is not my imagination and I am not sure how they are related, but I have not had v86d segfault on me since applying the fix for Bug #269651. (see post - James Westby, 2008-10-20)

Before this v86d would segfault at once very fresh session. (the lack of v86d didn't affect much, just losing the tail -vf of my logs that I had on tty8 and my virtual consoles.)

Changed in v86d:
status: Unknown → New
Revision history for this message
Evgeni Golov (evgeni) wrote :

Is this one still reproducible with current karmic and v86d 0.1.9?

Revision history for this message
dino99 (9d9) wrote :

That version has died long ago; no more supported

Changed in v86d (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Invalid
Changed in v86d (Debian):
importance: Unknown → Undecided
status: New → Invalid
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.