doesn't render http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=gbemol correctly

[StefanPotyra]

Binary package hint: firefox-3.0

Hi,

firefox-3.0 (3.0~b5+nobinonly-0ubuntu3) doesn't render http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=gbemol correctly, as there are separator lines inside the table missing. (resolution: 1280 x 1024). Of course I've validated the revu page, and it is valid according to www.w3c.org.

Setting to high, as incorrect table rendering most probably affects a very large number of users (and the revu page is hardly readable with that bug).

Cheers,
    Stefan.

[Alexander Sack (asac)]

we need screenshots and reference screenshots showing how it should look like right now.

[StefanPotyra (sistpoty)]

Aha. I of course missed the CSS when validating, which *does* contain errors (not to the table in question though, as far as I've seen, but maybe this is related).

[StefanPotyra (sistpoty)]

please note the line between the comment from warp10 and from pitti.

[Alexander Sack (asac)]

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 09:04:25PM -0000, StefanPotyra wrote:
> Aha. I of course missed the CSS when validating, which *does* contain
> errors (not to the table in question though, as far as I've seen, but
> maybe this is related).
>

Yes, please be sure that this is not a html/css bug ;)

 - Alexander

[StefanPotyra (sistpoty)]

ok, I'll make a static copy of that page and fix up the bad css soonish. let's see what ff will do then :).

[StefanPotyra (sistpoty)]

Hi Alexander,

Unfortunately revu was updated before I made a static copy. Nonetheless, the missing separator lines are still there. However I've sent a problem report via firefox's menu, so I'm marking the "affects firefox" as invalid.

Cheers, and sorry for the noise,
    Stefan.

[StefanPotyra (sistpoty)]

setting revu bug to medium, thanks to RainCT (who updated the details page). Doesn't look too bad now.

[Siegfried Gevatter (rainct)]

The CSS should be valid now.

[Alexander Sack (asac)]

On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 08:27:20AM -0000, Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT) wrote:
> The CSS should be valid now.
>

OK, thanks. mail headers suggest that this bug is still open ... closing.

 affects revu
 status fixreleased

 - Alexander