Second cut for -mobile promotions

Bug #211675 reported by Steve Kowalik
16
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Ubuntu
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
fbreader (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
galculator (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
hildon-control-panel (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
libhildon (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
marquee-plugins (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
mobile-basic-flash (Ubuntu)
Won't Fix
Undecided
Unassigned
python-hildon (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
sapwood (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
sdk-default-icons (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
High
Unassigned

Bug Description

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

This is the smaller set of packages to look at for promotion to main for
Ubuntu Mobile in Hardy. All of these packages are directly seeded by
either mobile or mobile-dev, and all of the Depends and Build-Depends
should already be in main.

 affects ubuntu/fbreader
 affects ubuntu/galculator
 affects ubuntu/hildon-control-panel
 affects ubuntu/marquee-plugins
 affects ubuntu/mobile-basic-flash
 affects ubuntu/python-hildon
 affects ubuntu/sapwood
 affects ubuntu/sdk-default-icons
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFH9cB3CfB0CMh//C8RAj7MAJ4+ohyC8bFPuadHtUDb6E9KpgsiKACePHjD
AllGR5IQuG0ZgXfoBf3H1ag=
=erkp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

please add the inclusion reports.

Changed in python-hildon:
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Bill Filler (bfiller) wrote :

added hildon-desktop and libhildon as newer versions have been pushed to the UME PPA. Would be nice to get these into Hardy.

Revision history for this message
Bill Filler (bfiller) wrote :

sorry, wrong bug, this does not affect hildon-desktop

Revision history for this message
Bill Filler (bfiller) wrote :

libhildon is not affected either, wrong bug

Revision history for this message
Steve Kowalik (stevenk) wrote :

MIR for fbreader

1. Availability: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/f/fbreader; available for all supported architectures
2. Rationale: Seeded by mobile.
3. Security:
   * No CVE entries: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=FBReader
   * No history in Secunia: http://secunia.com/search/?search=FBReader
   * No suid/sgid binaries or daemons.
   * Only network access is very GIO/GVFS.
   * It directly processes various e-book formats.
4. Quality assurance:
   * Package works out of the box.
   * No debconf questions.
   * No showstopper or relevant open bugs in the Debian BTS: http://bugs.debian.org/src:fbreader
   * Maintenance in Debian is calm.
   * Upstream is calm/vigorous.
   * Upstream bug tracker is at http://www.fbreader.org/mantis/view_all_bug_page.php ; no showstoppers
   * Does not deal with hardware directly.
   * No test suite.
5. Standards compliance:
   * Compiles with FHS, and Debian Policy.
   * It provides a few libraries, and complies with Debian library packaging guide.
   * Straight debhelper, no patch system or oddities.
6. Dependencies:
   * The fbreader package depends on a bunch of libraries that provided by the source package itself.
   * All Build-Depends and Depends are in main.
7. Background information:
   * Upstream call this software "FBReader", with the capitalization.

Revision history for this message
Steve Kowalik (stevenk) wrote :

MIR for galculator

1. Availability: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/g/galculator; available for all supported architectures
2. Rationale: Seeded by mobile.
3. Security:
   * No CVE entries: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=galculator
   * No history in Secunia: http://secunia.com/search/?search=galculator
   * No suid/sgid binaries or daemons.
   * No network access.
4. Quality assurance:
   * Package works out of the box.
   * No debconf questions.
   * No showstopper or relevant open bugs in the Debian BTS: http://bugs.debian.org/src:galculator
   * Maintenance in Debian is calm.
   * Upstream is calm.
   * Upstream bug tracker is at https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=80471&atid=559874 ; no showstoppers
   * Does not deal with hardware directly.
   * No test suite.
5. Standards compliance:
   * Compiles with FHS, and Debian Policy.
   * CDBS using debhelper, CDBS's patch system and no oddities.
6. Dependencies:
   * All Build-Depends and Depends are in main.

Revision history for this message
Steve Kowalik (stevenk) wrote :

MIR for hildon-control-panel

1. Availability: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/h/hildon-control-panel; available for all supported architectures
2. Rationale: Seeded by mobile.
3. Security:
   * No CVE entries: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=hildon-control-panel
   * No history in Secunia: http://secunia.com/search/?search=hildon-control-panel
   * No suid/sgid binaries or daemons.
   * No network access.
4. Quality assurance:
   * Package works out of the box.
   * No debconf questions.
   * Package is not in Debian.
   * Upstream is calm.
   * Upstream bug tracker is at https://bugs.maemo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=hildon-control-panel ; no showstoppers
   * Does not deal with hardware directly.
   * No test suite.
5. Standards compliance:
   * Compiles with FHS, and Debian Policy.
   * CDBS using debhelper, no patch system or oddities.
6. Dependencies:
   * All Build-Depends and Depends are in main.

Revision history for this message
Steve Kowalik (stevenk) wrote :

MIR for marquee-plugins

1. Availability: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/m/marquee-plugins; available for all supported architectures
2. Rationale: Seeded by mobile.
3. Security:
   * No CVE entries: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=marquee-plugins
   * No history in Secunia: http://secunia.com/search/?search=marquee-plugins
   * No suid/sgid binaries or daemons.
   * No network access.
4. Quality assurance:
   * Package works out of the box.
   * No debconf questions.
   * Package is not in Debian.
   * Upstream is vigorous.
   * Upstream is Intel, and they use Launchpad for bug reports.
   * Does not deal with hardware directly.
   * No test suite.
5. Standards compliance:
   * Compiles with FHS, and Debian Policy.
   * CDBS using debhelper, no patch system or oddities.
6. Dependencies:
   * All Build-Depends and Depends aside from libxul and friends are in main. I will sort that out directly.

Revision history for this message
Steve Kowalik (stevenk) wrote :

MIR for mobile-basic-flash

1. Availability: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/m/mobile-basic-flash; available for all supported architectures
2. Rationale: Seeded by mobile.
3. Security:
   * No CVE entries: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=mobile-basic-flash
   * No history in Secunia: http://secunia.com/search/?search=mobile-basic-flash
   * No suid/sgid binaries or daemons.
   * No network access.
4. Quality assurance:
   * Package works out of the box.
   * No debconf questions.
   * Package is not in Debian.
   * Upstream is vigorous.
   * Upstream is Intel, and they use Launchpad for bug reports.
   * Does not deal with hardware directly.
   * No test suite.
5. Standards compliance:
   * Compiles with FHS, and Debian Policy.
   * CDBS using debhelper, no patch system or oddities.
6. Dependencies:
   * All Build-Depends and Depends aside from libxul and friends are in main. I will sort that out directly.

Revision history for this message
Steve Kowalik (stevenk) wrote :

MIR for python-hildon

1. Availability: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/p/python-hildon; available for all supported architectures
2. Rationale: Seeded by mobile.
3. Security:
   * No CVE entries: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=python-hildon
   * No history in Secunia: http://secunia.com/search/?search=python-hildon
   * No suid/sgid binaries or daemons.
   * No network access.
4. Quality assurance:
   * Package works out of the box.
   * No debconf questions.
   * Package is not in Debian.
   * Upstream is calm.
   * Upstream bug tracker is at https://garage.maemo.org/tracker/?atid=229&group_id=40&func=browse ; no showstoppers
   * Does not deal with hardware directly.
   * No test suite.
5. Standards compliance:
   * Compiles with FHS, and Debian Policy.
   * CDBS using debhelper, no patch system or oddities.
6. Dependencies:
   * All Build-Depends and Depends are in main.

Changed in python-hildon:
status: Incomplete → New
Revision history for this message
Steve Kowalik (stevenk) wrote :

MIR for sapwood

1. Availability: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/s/sapwood; available for all supported architectures
2. Rationale: Seeded by mobile.
3. Security:
   * No CVE entries: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=sapwood
   * No history in Secunia: http://secunia.com/search/?search=sapwood
   * No suid/sgid binaries or daemons.
   * No network access.
4. Quality assurance:
   * Package works out of the box.
   * No debconf questions.
   * No showstopper or relevant open bugs in the Debian BTS: http://bugs.debian.org/src:sapwood
   * Maintenance in Debian is calm.
   * Upstream is calm.
   * Upstream bug tracker is at https://bugs.maemo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=sapwood ; no showstoppers
   * Does not deal with hardware directly.
   * No test suite.
5. Standards compliance:
   * Compiles with FHS, and Debian Policy.
   * CDBS using debhelper, no patch system or oddities.
6. Dependencies:
   * All Build-Depends and Depends are in main.

Revision history for this message
Steve Kowalik (stevenk) wrote :

MIR for sdk-default-icons

1. Availability: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/s/sdk-default-icons; available for all supported architectures
2. Rationale: Seeded by mobile.
3. Security:
   * No CVE entries: It's a bunch of icons.
   * No history in Secunia: As for CVE.
   * No binaries at all.
   * No network access.
4. Quality assurance:
   * Package works out of the box.
   * No debconf questions.
   * Package isn't in Debian.
   * Upstream is calm.
   * I can't find any mention of sdk-default-icons in Maemo's bugtracker.
   * Does not deal with hardware directly.
   * No test suite.
5. Standards compliance:
   * Compiles with FHS, and Debian Policy.
   * Debhelper, no patch system or oddities.
6. Dependencies:
   * No Depends, all Build-Depends in main.

Revision history for this message
Steve Kowalik (stevenk) wrote :

Sapwood is straight debhelper, not CDBS.

Revision history for this message
Steve Kowalik (stevenk) wrote :

libhildon is already in main

Changed in libhildon:
status: New → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

for the future, please use separate reports

Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

python-hildon is ok to promote to main

Changed in python-hildon:
status: New → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

ok for promotion to main, although hildon-control-panel-l10n is not in main as stated in the MIR. looks trivial, added as well.

Changed in hildon-control-panel:
status: New → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

the sdk-default-icons packaging looks ok, but the license reads:
You are free:

    * to Share <E2><80><94> to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work
    * to Remix <E2><80><94> to make derivative works

which doesn't allow modification of the work. IMO this has to go to multiverse instead.
setting the release milestone to resolve this.

Changed in sdk-default-icons:
milestone: none → ubuntu-8.04
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

fbreader is ok for promotion to main

Changed in fbreader:
status: New → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

galculator is ready for promotion to main

Changed in galculator:
status: New → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

sapwood:
 - there is a final release, instead of the current beta: http://packages.debian.org/source/sapwood
   does it make sense to upgrade this one? At least this is a theme which will be available on all
   other architectures as well
 - the packages itself looks ok.

Changed in sapwood:
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

fbreader:
 - debian is meanwhile at 0.8.17-1

Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

marquee-plugins is ok for promotion to main

Changed in marquee-plugins:
status: New → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

mobile-basic-flash:
 - needs to use xulrunner-1.9-dev instead of libxul-dev

Changed in mobile-basic-flash:
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote : Re: [Bug 211675] Re: Second cut for -mobile promotions

Bill Filler schrieb:
> added hildon-desktop and libhildon as newer versions have been pushed to
> the UME PPA. Would be nice to get these into Hardy.

please create a separate report for both of these (probably needing an upstream
version exception?)

Revision history for this message
Jonathan Riddell (jr) wrote :

2008-04-08 20:11:44 INFO Override Component to: 'main'
2008-04-08 20:11:44 INFO 'fbreader - 0.8.14-1ubuntu1/main/text' source overridden

Changed in fbreader:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Jonathan Riddell (jr) wrote :

2008-04-08 20:12:46 INFO 'galculator - 1.2.5.2-1ubuntu2/main/math' source overridden

Changed in galculator:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Jonathan Riddell (jr) wrote :

2008-04-08 20:15:06 INFO 'hildon-control-panel - 1:1.9.5-1ubuntu6/main/x11' source overridden

Changed in hildon-control-panel:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Jonathan Riddell (jr) wrote :

2008-04-08 20:16:51 INFO 'marquee-plugins - 0.4/main/libs' source overridden

Changed in marquee-plugins:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Jonathan Riddell (jr) wrote :

2008-04-08 20:17:52 INFO 'python-hildon - 0.8.8-1ubuntu2/main/python' source overridden

Changed in python-hildon:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Steve Kowalik (stevenk) wrote :

sapwood 3.0.0.debian.1-2 has been synced from Debian, and has built on every arch aside from hppa.

Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

sapwood; ok for promotion

Changed in sapwood:
status: Incomplete → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

sapwood promoted

Changed in sapwood:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Steve Langasek (vorlon)
Changed in sdk-default-icons:
milestone: ubuntu-8.04 → none
Revision history for this message
Steve Kowalik (stevenk) wrote :

New mobile-basic-flash uploaded that uses xulrunner-1.9, please recheck.

Changed in mobile-basic-flash:
status: Incomplete → New
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

sdk-default-icons demoted to multiverse, since it is non-free (CC 2.5, no modification).

The package is much worse, though:

 - The .deb does not ship copyright
 - It is a native tar.gz, although it is not an in-house production
 - upstream does not ship any copyright statement, license document
 - debian/copyright does not show any download location

Please get this fixed in the next days. I'll remove the current version from the archive on, say, next Tuesday.

Changed in sdk-default-icons:
importance: Undecided → High
milestone: none → ubuntu-8.04
Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

the mobile-basic-flash packages contains binary flash code without providing the source, but is licensed under the LGPL. in the current form we have to remove that package from the archive.

Changed in mobile-basic-flash:
importance: Undecided → High
milestone: none → ubuntu-8.04
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

<lool> doko: These are actually the files which are being opened in the GUI to edit these
<lool> doko: So this is the preferred form of modification and use and these files were made under the same license
<doko> lool: ohh, really? point taken
<lool> doko: Nobody likes the files, and they are said to have some bugs; it would be best to move to something else, but we also use the package for pure html UIs
<doko> lool: did somebody look at the source code? I can't review this :-/
<lool> doko: Consider them like .pngs
<doko> ok

ready for promotion

Changed in mobile-basic-flash:
status: Incomplete → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

mobile-basic-flash promoted.

Changed in mobile-basic-flash:
importance: High → Undecided
milestone: ubuntu-8.04 → none
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Steve Langasek (vorlon)
Changed in sdk-default-icons:
milestone: ubuntu-8.04 → none
Revision history for this message
Steve Kowalik (stevenk) wrote :

It looks like sdk-default-icons is not needed, and should be removed from the archive. Setting sdk-default-icons' task to Confirmed and subscribing ubuntu-archive.

Changed in sdk-default-icons:
status: Incomplete → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Martin Pitt (pitti) wrote :

2008-04-22 07:04:09 INFO Removing candidates:
2008-04-22 07:04:09 INFO sdk-default-icons 2.0-4.1ubuntu3 in hardy
2008-04-22 07:04:09 INFO sdk-default-icons 2.0-4.1ubuntu3 in hardy amd64
2008-04-22 07:04:09 INFO sdk-default-icons 2.0-4.1ubuntu3 in hardy hppa
2008-04-22 07:04:09 INFO sdk-default-icons 2.0-4.1ubuntu3 in hardy i386
2008-04-22 07:04:09 INFO sdk-default-icons 2.0-4.1ubuntu3 in hardy ia64
2008-04-22 07:04:09 INFO sdk-default-icons 2.0-4.1ubuntu3 in hardy lpia
2008-04-22 07:04:09 INFO sdk-default-icons 2.0-4.1ubuntu3 in hardy powerpc
2008-04-22 07:04:09 INFO sdk-default-icons 2.0-4.1ubuntu3 in hardy sparc
2008-04-22 07:04:09 INFO Removed-by: Martin Pitt
2008-04-22 07:04:09 INFO Comment: not needed by mobile, non-free, #211675
2008-04-22 07:04:09 INFO 8 packages successfully removed.

Changed in sdk-default-icons:
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Steve Kowalik (stevenk) wrote :

mobile-basic-flash's xul 1.9 port is incomplete and doesn't look to be working. I have gotten mobile-basic-flash demoted, and will upload a new version that moves it back to libxul-dev.

Changed in mobile-basic-flash:
status: Fix Released → Incomplete
status: Incomplete → Won't Fix
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Related questions

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.