Gfaim : doesn't print

Bug #209228 reported by Emmanuel Gontcho
6
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gfaim (Ubuntu)
In Progress
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: gfaim

doesn't print

Revision history for this message
Daniel T Chen (crimsun) wrote :

Is this symptom still reproducible in 8.10 or 9.04?

Changed in gfaim:
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
antoine (antoine-) wrote :

Hi
I am using 8.10 and the problem still exits :(

Revision history for this message
François Blondel (francoisblondel) wrote :
Download full text (8.4 KiB)

Hi,
I'm using Jaunty up-to-date, and I become that :

francois@franfran:~$ gfaim
*** stack smashing detected ***: gfaim terminated
======= Backtrace: =========
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x48)[0xb7996da8]
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x0)[0xb7996d60]
gfaim[0x8049f3a]
gfaim[0x804b20d]
/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe5)[0xb78af775]
gfaim[0x8049a41]
======= Memory map: ========
08048000-08051000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 329416 /usr/bin/gfaim
08051000-08053000 rw-p 00008000 08:05 329416 /usr/bin/gfaim
08fe2000-092fb000 rw-p 08fe2000 00:00 0 [heap]
b68cf000-b6988000 rw-p b69e7000 00:00 0
b69e1000-b69ee000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 213074 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
b69ee000-b69ef000 r--p 0000c000 08:05 213074 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
b69ef000-b69f0000 rw-p 0000d000 08:05 213074 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
b6a0e000-b6a14000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 778720 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-xpm.so
b6a14000-b6a15000 r--p 00005000 08:05 778720 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-xpm.so
b6a15000-b6a16000 rw-p 00006000 08:05 778720 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-xpm.so
b6a16000-b6a17000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 778722 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/im-cedilla.so
b6a17000-b6a18000 r--p 00000000 08:05 778722 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/im-cedilla.so
b6a18000-b6a19000 rw-p 00001000 08:05 778722 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/immodules/im-cedilla.so
b6a19000-b7031000 rw-p b6a19000 00:00 0
b7031000-b7033000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 401426 /usr/lib/pango/1.6.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so
b7033000-b7034000 r--p 00001000 08:05 401426 /usr/lib/pango/1.6.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so
b7034000-b7035000 rw-p 00002000 08:05 401426 /usr/lib/pango/1.6.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so
b7035000-b70cd000 r--p 00000000 08:05 885754 /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf
b70cd000-b70d3000 r--s 00000000 08:05 750192 /var/cache/fontconfig/945677eb7aeaf62f1d50efc3fb3ec7d8-x86.cache-2
b70d3000-b70d5000 r--s 00000000 08:05 750158 /var/cache/fontconfig/99e8ed0e538f840c565b6ed5dad60d56-x86.cache-2
b70d5000-b70d8000 r--s 00000000 08:05 750179 /var/cache/fontconfig/e383d7ea5fbe662a33d9b44caf393297-x86.cache-2
b70d8000-b70da000 r--s 00000000 08:05 750160 /var/cache/fontconfig/c69f04ab05004e31a6d5e715764f16d8-x86.cache-2
b70da000-b70dd000 r--s 00000000 08:05 750155 /var/cache/fontconfig/6eb3985aa4124903f6ff08ba781cd364-x86.cache-2
b70dd000-b70de000 r--s 00000000 08:05 750145 /var/cache/fontconfig/4c73fe0c47614734b17d736dbde7580a-x86.cache-2
b70de000-b70e1000 r--s 00000000 08:05 750167 /var/cache/fontconfig/a755afe4a08bf5b97852ceb7400b47bc-x86.cache-2
b70e1000-b70e8000 r--s 00000000 08:05 750152 /var/cache/fontconfig/6d41288fd70b0be22e8c3a91e032eec0-x86.cache-2
b70e8000-b70f0000 r--s 00000000 08:05 750146 /var/cache/fontconfig/e3de0de479f42330eadf588a55fb5bf4-x86.cache-2
b70f0000-b70fb000 r--s 00000000 08:05 750141 /var/cache/fontconfig/0f34bcd4b6ee430af32735b75db7f02b-x86.cache-2
b70fb000-b70fd000 r--s 00000000 08:05 750180 /var/cache/fontconfig/2c5ba8142dffc8bf0377700342b8ca1a-x86.cache-2
b70fd000-b7100000 r--s 00000000 08...

Read more...

Changed in gfaim (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → New
Revision history for this message
Bazoo (basiledeplante) wrote :

Same problem on my 9.04 install.
I also get the exactly same output as reported by user François Blondel in is comment.
(I've fix the problem by downloading and compiling gfaim's sources)

Revision history for this message
François Blondel (francoisblondel) wrote :

Hi,
I have tested with Karmic alpha 4 and gfaim has worked without errors in the terminal.

Changed in gfaim (Ubuntu):
status: New → In Progress
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.