nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a()

Bug #2063882 reported by Christians
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
nautilus (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Crash when changing to sub-directory in top bar.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
Package: nautilus 1:45~rc-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-28.29-generic 6.5.13
Uname: Linux 6.5.0-28-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CrashCounter: 1
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Fri Apr 26 21:20:40 2024
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus
InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-06-06 (325 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.04 "Lunar Lobster" - Release amd64 (20230418)
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/nautilus --gapplication-service
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x72cfd94bec39 <g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a+9>: mov (%rdi),%rax
 PC (0x72cfd94bec39) ok
 source "(%rdi)" (0x5b7d00000001) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%rax" ok
SegvReason: reading unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: nautilus
StacktraceTop:
 g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_object_ref () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_list_copy_deep () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to mantic on 2023-10-14 (195 days ago)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sudo users
mtime.conffile..etc.apport.crashdb.conf: 2024-03-06T17:35:57.237100
separator:

usr_lib_nautilus:
 file-roller 43.0-1
 nautilus-extension-gnome-terminal 3.49.92-2ubuntu1
 nautilus-image-converter 0.4.0-2
 python3-nautilus 4.0-1build1

Revision history for this message
Christians (script-vollbio) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1813171, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Private → Public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.