Link bugs in ubuntu packages to the actual project

Bug #203993 reported by Dennis Schridde
2
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Launchpad itself
Incomplete
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/warzone2100 shows bugs for warzone2100, but https://bugs.launchpad.net/warzone2100 does not. This is even though both are linked.

Tags: lp-bugs
Revision history for this message
Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt) wrote :

Dennis, what do you mean by "both are linked"?

Currently none of the bugs listed at <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/warzone2100> are recorded as also affecting upstream Warzone 2100. That's why they don't show up at <https://bugs.launchpad.net/warzone2100>.

Changed in launchpad:
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Christian Reis (kiko) wrote : Re: [Bug 203993] Re: Link bugs in ubuntu packages to the actual project

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:35:44AM -0000, Matthew Thomas wrote:
> Dennis, what do you mean by "both are linked"?

He means the packaging information that is displayed at the bottom right
of:

    https://edge.launchpad.net/warzone2100/

I think we should file a new bug to cover this as we need to either
forbid adding these records and sanitize information, or rethink the
deletion UI.
--
Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 3376 0125

Revision history for this message
Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt) wrote :

Ok, I've reported bug 204117 about that problem, but it doesn't seem related to this bug report.

Revision history for this message
Dennis Schridde (devurandom) wrote :

So to make a bugreport to the Ubuntu package of warzone2100 also show up in the warzone2100 launchpad-bugs-section, I would have to select "Also affects project" on that bug? That will not happen automatically?

Revision history for this message
Christian Reis (kiko) wrote :

Yes. The short explanation is that a bug in the packaged version may be
caused by the act of packaging, and not the original source code. Does
that make sense?

Revision history for this message
Dennis Schridde (devurandom) wrote :

It does.

Revision history for this message
Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt) wrote :

In future we'll make it more obvious that the next step, for a bug report filed on a package but not on a project, is to check and record whether the bug occurs in the upstream project.

Revision history for this message
Sam Brightman (sambrightman) wrote :

Honestly, I don't think it's enough to provide it as a next step. A lot of people seem to agree that the current arrangement is plain confusing. It's not just submitters that will have this issue - in fact, I think un-logged-in people searching for bugs is probably the most common case.

Revision history for this message
Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt) wrote :

Fixing bug 3152 should reduce that confusion a lot. I appreciate that it is awkward for Launchpad to have separate bug listings for projects and packages. But this is integral to why Launchpad exists: to improve collaboration between distributors and upstream developers, while minimizing noise from issues that are specific to one or the other. See also bug 76416.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.