Orphaned or not maintained?
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
backintime (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Hello,
upstream maintainer here.
I'm aware that Back In Time is not part of the official Canonical Ubuntu but just the community drivin "universe" repo.
But I wonder if this package is still maintained or orphaned in the community. The latest Ubuntu 23.10 (mantic) still has version 1.3.3-4. I'm I right so far?
https:/
At upstream the version 1.3.3 was replaced by 1.4.0 last month and is currently at 1.4.1 (two weeks ago).
Why wasn't the Ubuntu package updated before the Ubuntu release?
This situation cause extra costs at upstream project and burns resources. It is because we have to deal with users thinking they do use a fresh/latest Back In Time because their Ubuntu is the latest also. And they report bugs which are not relevant anymore in the latest upstream release.
I wonder why you don't use Debians backintime package instead? It is up-to-date most of the time. And isn't Ubuntu "debian-based"?
Kind
Christian Buhtz
Changed in backintime (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Invalid → New |
Changed in backintime (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Confirmed → Fix Released |
I have to add that also the bug reports here at Launchpad indicating that the package is not maintained.