add support for Green Linux, fork linux mint

Bug #2024950 reported by saber716rus
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Apport
Triaged
Wishlist
Unassigned
apport (Ubuntu)
Incomplete
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

oscillation@oscillation-NEO-M114:~$ ubuntu-bug gnome-software

*** Collecting information about the problem

The collected information can be sent to developers
to improve the application. This may take a few minutes.
...........

*** A problem in gnome-software

Unable to report a problem:

It looks like this is an unofficial Green package. Try again after updating the indexes of available packages. If this does not help, then remove the relevant third-party packages and try again.

To continue, press any key...

There are no pending crash messages. Try the --help key.

kolab@kolab-NEO-M114:~$ nala show apart
Package: import
Version: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
koljab@koljab-NEO-M114:~$ cat /etc/os-release
NAME="Green Linux"
VERSION="21.2 (Victoria)"
ID=linuxmint
ID_LIKE="ubuntu debian"
PRETTY_NAME="Green Linux 21.2 Cinnamon 64-bit"
VERSION_ID="21"
HOME_URL="https://greenlinux.ru/"
SUPPORT_URL="https://forum.linuxmint.su/"
BUG_REPORT_URL="http://linuxmint-troubleshooting-guide.readthedocs.io/ru/latest/"
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://greenlinux.ru/"
VERSION_CODENAME=victoria
UBUNTU_CODENAME=jammy
koljab@koljab-NEO-M114:~$
---
ProblemType: Bug
ApportLog:

ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CrashReports:
 640:1000:1000:88955:2023-06-20 14:14:04.299071363 +0300:2023-06-20 14:14:04.299071363 +0300:/var/crash/_usr_share_cinnamon_cinnamon-settings_xlet-settings.py.1000.crash
 640:1000:1000:44330:2023-06-24 09:55:41.470598469 +0300:2023-06-24 09:55:41.470598469 +0300:/var/crash/_usr_bin_cinnamon-subprocess-wrapper.1000.crash
CurrentDesktop: X-Cinnamon
DistroRelease: Green Linux 21
InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-06-09 (15 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Green Linux 21.1.1 "Victoria" (20230512)
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
Package: apport 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5 [origin: Ubuntu]
PackageArchitecture: all
Tags: third-party-packages victoria
Uname: Linux 6.3.9-x64v3-xanmod1 x86_64
UnreportableReason: Похоже, это неофициальный пакет Green. Повторите попытку после обновления индексов доступных пакетов. Если это не помогает, тогда удалите соответствующие сторонние пакеты и попробуйте ещё раз.
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip libvirt lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo
_MarkForUpload: True

Revision history for this message
Chris Guiver (guiverc) wrote (last edit ):

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better.

Please execute the following command only once, as it will automatically gather debugging information, in a terminal:

apport-collect 2024950

When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-bug' and the name of the package affected. You can learn more about this functionality at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs.

Please note: `ubuntu-bug`, `apport` & bug reporting tools are provided with Ubuntu by default, many require manual addition for some releases of downstream OSes based on Ubuntu (eg. Linux Mint & other Ubuntu based systems). You should check with your distribution first.

(the various fields in this bug report have not been filled; which is done automatically when apport tools are used.. these make exploring the bug report much easier)

Changed in apport (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
saber716rus (saber716rus-r) wrote : Dependencies.txt

apport information

tags: added: apport-collected third-party-packages victoria
description: updated
Revision history for this message
saber716rus (saber716rus-r) wrote : ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

apport information

Revision history for this message
saber716rus (saber716rus-r) wrote : ProcEnviron.txt

apport information

Revision history for this message
saber716rus (saber716rus-r) wrote :

sent logs. Is there any result?

Revision history for this message
Simon Chopin (schopin) wrote :

Hi,

Thanks for taking the time to report the issue. I've tried to reproduce the issue in Ubuntu in a fresh Jammy VM, without success, and the provided logs don't really help us out.

However, it appears you're not using Ubuntu, but rather a derivative. While we'd probably welcome patches in the upstream apport project to help integration, this is probably *not* a Ubuntu problem. You need to report the issue with your distribution, and have them investigate it. Thus, I'm marking the issue as Invalid in Ubuntu, and opening an issue in the upstream tracker instead.

Changed in apport:
status: New → Triaged
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
Revision history for this message
saber716rus (saber716rus-r) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Simon Chopin (schopin) wrote :

I'll reiterate my point: the issue being discussed is a Green Linux issue, this should be discussed wherever that distribution does its development, and investigated by its developers. For the `apport` Ubuntu package this is completely out of scope.

I'll also clarify our position as upstream Apport developers: our primary target is Ubuntu. While we are completely open to the idea of merging some code to make it easier for other distributions to use apport, it is expected for those distributions to do the actual integration themselves.

Revision history for this message
saber716rus (saber716rus-r) wrote :

So, the bottom line is that green linux is based on Ubuntu LTS (22.04). Accordingly, all packages are based on Ubuntu 22.04. Packages are not rebuilt, as it happens with debian on ubuntu.

Revision history for this message
saber716rus (saber716rus-r) wrote :

can you throw apport to the source?

Revision history for this message
Simon Chopin (schopin) wrote :

Hi,

I'm sorry, I'm not entirely sure I understood that correctly, but if you're looking for the apport sources, you can find them there:

https://github.com/canonical/apport

Revision history for this message
saber716rus (saber716rus-r) wrote :

Yes, thanks, but there is no technical possibility to make edits yet.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.