[NONFREE-DOC:OPL] alcovebook-intro is licensed under OPL 1.0

Bug #19910 reported by Debian Bug Importer
4
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
alcovebook-sgml (Debian)
Fix Released
Unknown
alcovebook-sgml (Ubuntu)
Invalid
High
Unassigned

Bug Description

Automatically imported from Debian bug report #321771 http://bugs.debian.org/321771

Revision history for this message
In , Aurelien Jarno (aurelien-aurel32) wrote : Retitling bugs

retitle 266404 kstars is not DFSG free
retitle 266405 lg-issue10 is not DFSG free
retitle 266406 lg-issue100 is not DFSG free
retitle 266407 alcovebook-sgml-doc is not DFSG free
retitle 266408 lg-issue97 is not DFSG free
retitle 266409 lg-issue98 is not DFSG free
retitle 266410 rubybook is not DFSG free
retitle 266411 lg-issue102 is not DFSG free
retitle 266412 lg-issue103 is not DFSG free
retitle 266413 lg-issue101 is not DFSG free
retitle 266414 zope-devguide-examples is not DFSG free
retitle 266415 wdg-html-reference is not DFSG free
retitle 266416 wdg-html-validator is not DFSG free
retitle 266417 docbook is not DFSG free
retitle 266418 ri is not DFSG free
thanks

--
  .''`. Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer
 `. `' <email address hidden> | <email address hidden>
   `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net

Revision history for this message
In , Frank Lichtenheld (djpig) wrote : Analysis of this bug report

clone 266407 -1 -2
severity -1 normal
retitle -1 conflicting license statements in alcovebook-intro
retitle 266407 [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] reference manual is licensed under GFDL
retitle -2 [NONFREE-DOC:OPL] alcovebook-intro is licensed under OPL 1.0
thanks

Some observations:

- the reference manual license is stated as for the generated material
  only and is by the maintainer himself. I would suggest to just declare
  GPL instead like the source code (I don't know if re-licensing the
  generated material under GFDL is even legal, but that's not the point
  here anyway)

- The alcovebook-intro contains one notice that it is licensed under
  GFDL and one that it is licensed under OPL, but from what I see the
  OPL one is the right one.

Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Automatically imported from Debian bug report #321771 http://bugs.debian.org/321771

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 22:24:39 +0200
From: Aurelien Jarno <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>

Subject: alcovebook-sgml-doc is not DFSG free
Package: alcovebook-sgml-doc
Severity: serious
Justification: DFSG
Tags: sarge-ignore

debian-legal has recently reconsidered the Open Publication License
and has determined that it is a license that is not free. See:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/03/msg00226.html

It appears that your package is using data under that license. So you
could either:
1) persuade the upstream author to change the license
2) move the package to non-free
3) could ask the package to be removed

Anyway, documentation licence issues are not being considered RC for
sarge, that's why the bug is tagget as Sarge ignore. That's let you some
time to persuade the upstream author :)

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 22:50:36 +0200
From: Aurelien Jarno <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Retitling bugs

retitle 266404 kstars is not DFSG free
retitle 266405 lg-issue10 is not DFSG free
retitle 266406 lg-issue100 is not DFSG free
retitle 266407 alcovebook-sgml-doc is not DFSG free
retitle 266408 lg-issue97 is not DFSG free
retitle 266409 lg-issue98 is not DFSG free
retitle 266410 rubybook is not DFSG free
retitle 266411 lg-issue102 is not DFSG free
retitle 266412 lg-issue103 is not DFSG free
retitle 266413 lg-issue101 is not DFSG free
retitle 266414 zope-devguide-examples is not DFSG free
retitle 266415 wdg-html-reference is not DFSG free
retitle 266416 wdg-html-validator is not DFSG free
retitle 266417 docbook is not DFSG free
retitle 266418 ri is not DFSG free
thanks

--
  .''`. Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer
 `. `' <email address hidden> | <email address hidden>
   `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 15:55:54 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Analysis of this bug report

clone 266407 -1 -2
severity -1 normal
retitle -1 conflicting license statements in alcovebook-intro
retitle 266407 [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] reference manual is licensed under GFDL
retitle -2 [NONFREE-DOC:OPL] alcovebook-intro is licensed under OPL 1.0
thanks

Some observations:

- the reference manual license is stated as for the generated material
  only and is by the maintainer himself. I would suggest to just declare
  GPL instead like the source code (I don't know if re-licensing the
  generated material under GFDL is even legal, but that's not the point
  here anyway)

- The alcovebook-intro contains one notice that it is licensed under
  GFDL and one that it is licensed under OPL, but from what I see the
  OPL one is the right one.

Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :

Doc licensing issue

Revision history for this message
In , Pierre Habouzit (madcoder) wrote : Re: Regarding the reference manual for alcovebook

  Hi yann, any progress on this ? if you can make upstream confirm that
the material is licensed under the GFDL with no invariant sections and
such, this year GR makes it DFSG-free.

  though I agree that only the PDF intro document speaks about GFDL,
current licensing state of that package is unclear and need to be
clarified.

On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 08:22:40AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Frank Litchenheld wrote:
> > the reference manual license is stated as for the generated material
> > only and is by the maintainer himself. I would suggest to just declare
> > GPL instead like the source code (I don't know if re-licensing the
> > generated material under GFDL is even legal, but that's not the point
> > here anyway)
>
> It's legal to *dual-license* it under the GFDL. However, if the source is
> under the GPL, then the auto-generated reference manual is under the GPL,
> too; that's the way it works. It would be really nice to ask the maintainer
> to make that explicit, however.
>
>
>

--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O <email address hidden>
OOO http://www.madism.org

Revision history for this message
In , Yann Dirson (ydirson-altern) wrote :

On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 01:02:24PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
> Hi yann, any progress on this ? if you can make upstream confirm that
> the material is licensed under the GFDL with no invariant sections and
> such, this year GR makes it DFSG-free.

The reference manual itself does not have any specific copyright. It
is mostly material generated from the DTD itself, with only a couple
of things from alcovebook.dsc. Thus I close the bug about the
reference manual. I'm not sure why it was thought to be under GFDL.

> though I agree that only the PDF intro document speaks about GFDL,
> current licensing state of that package is unclear and need to be
> clarified.

The "intro" documents, however, have a different status: they are
derived from OPL documents, and thus fall under the OPL, but they
contain a GFDL notice.

Since those documents are not very useful anyway, I'll just drop them,
that should fix the remaining issue.

Best regards,
--
Yann Dirson <email address hidden> |
Debian-related: <email address hidden> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
                                    | Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
     http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>

Revision history for this message
In , Steinar H. Gunderson (sesse) wrote :

On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 02:18:42PM +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
> The "intro" documents, however, have a different status: they are
> derived from OPL documents, and thus fall under the OPL, but they
> contain a GFDL notice.
>
> Since those documents are not very useful anyway, I'll just drop them,
> that should fix the remaining issue.

This was over a month ago -- any progress?

/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

Revision history for this message
In , Joost van Baal (joostvb-debian-bugs-20060901-3) wrote : alcovebook-sgml-doc: tag 321771 etch-ignore: package is not in testing

tag 321771 etch-ignore
thanks

Since this package is not in testing.

Revision history for this message
In , Yann Dirson (dirson) wrote : Bug#321771: fixed in alcovebook-sgml 0.1.2dfsg-8

Source: alcovebook-sgml
Source-Version: 0.1.2dfsg-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
alcovebook-sgml, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

alcovebook-sgml-doc_0.1.2dfsg-8_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/alcovebook-sgml/alcovebook-sgml-doc_0.1.2dfsg-8_all.deb
alcovebook-sgml_0.1.2dfsg-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/alcovebook-sgml/alcovebook-sgml_0.1.2dfsg-8.diff.gz
alcovebook-sgml_0.1.2dfsg-8.dsc
  to pool/main/a/alcovebook-sgml/alcovebook-sgml_0.1.2dfsg-8.dsc
alcovebook-sgml_0.1.2dfsg-8_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/alcovebook-sgml/alcovebook-sgml_0.1.2dfsg-8_all.deb
alcovebook-sgml_0.1.2dfsg.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/a/alcovebook-sgml/alcovebook-sgml_0.1.2dfsg.orig.tar.gz

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to <email address hidden>,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Yann Dirson <email address hidden> (supplier of updated alcovebook-sgml package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing <email address hidden>)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 00:06:58 +0200
Source: alcovebook-sgml
Binary: alcovebook-sgml alcovebook-sgml-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1.2dfsg-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Yann Dirson <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Yann Dirson <email address hidden>
Description:
 alcovebook-sgml - Alcove customisation of the DocBook DTD and stylesheets
 alcovebook-sgml-doc - Documentation for the AlcoveBook DTD
Closes: 321770 321771
Changes:
 alcovebook-sgml (0.1.2dfsg-8) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Removed OPL/GFDL-licenced documentation from upstream tarball (Closes:
     #321770, #321771).
   * Removed matching doc-base files.
   * Updated extended description to reflect the removal of the intro
     documents.
   * Removed doc-specific copyright file, promoted
     alcovebook-sgml.copyright to be debian/copyright.
   * Updated FSF address in debian/copyright (lintian).
   * Moved debhelper from Buil-depends-indep to Build-depends (lintian).
Files:
 45a0fc2538012b893138e63ee7bc54af 776 text optional alcovebook-sgml_0.1.2dfsg-8.dsc
 7972bfb3aee90f0b9eadbf4b5e2748b9 68397 text optional alcovebook-sgml_0.1.2dfsg.orig.tar.gz
 5842b8b744094b4c3c1817914199b6a0 3361 text optional alcovebook-sgml_0.1.2dfsg-8.diff.gz
 cc03b6fc69131814b14195328591e45d 34348 text optional alcovebook-sgml_0.1.2dfsg-8_all.deb
 5973e4c189b3eac4dcfcad6a217b8d28 274786 text optional alcovebook-sgml-doc_0.1.2dfsg-8_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFBziiV1uVslwzwbgRAsUPAJ4rABPOnyfFvVtKKCDmXGZ/ZWFZbACfQCGD
E2gqWLVAIE5l60yOMXnSVcs=
=r1u9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Changed in alcovebook-sgml:
status: Unconfirmed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.