package built in old build-env, needs better build-deps

[Debian Bug Importer]

Automatically imported from Debian bug report #320720 http://bugs.debian.org/320720

[Debian Bug Importer (debzilla)]

Automatically imported from Debian bug report #320720 http://bugs.debian.org/320720

[Debian Bug Importer (debzilla)]

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 00:20:27 +0200
From: Matthias Klose <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: package built in old build-env, needs better build-deps

Package: htmlgen
Version: 1.8.24-1
Severity: serious

please build in a current unstable build environment, tighten the
build dependency on the libfltk1.1 development package.

[Matt Zimmerman (mdz)]

Problem with a Debian binary build

[Florian Ernst (florian-uni-hd)]

On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 00:20:27 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: htmlgen
> Version: 1.8.24-1
> Severity: serious
>
> please build in a current unstable build environment, tighten the
> build dependency on the libfltk1.1 development package.

As htmlgen has entered the archives in 1998 at revision 2.1 and
furthermore has no (Build-)Depends on anything fltk-like, I suppose
this was meant for another package...?

Unfortunately it eludes me which package this might be.

Cheers,
Flo

[Matthias Klose (doko-cs)]

Florian Ernst writes:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 00:20:27 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Package: htmlgen
> > Version: 1.8.24-1
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > please build in a current unstable build environment, tighten the
> > build dependency on the libfltk1.1 development package.
>
> As htmlgen has entered the archives in 1998 at revision 2.1 and
> furthermore has no (Build-)Depends on anything fltk-like, I suppose
> this was meant for another package...?
>
> Unfortunately it eludes me which package this might be.

sorry, htmldoc ... should'nt file bug report after midnight.

[Florian Ernst (florian-uni-hd)]

reassign 320720 htmldoc
thanks control@b.d.o BCCed

On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:11:31AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Florian Ernst writes:
> > On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 00:20:27 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > Package: htmlgen
> > > Version: 1.8.24-1
> > > Severity: serious
> > >
> > > please build in a current unstable build environment, tighten the
> > > build dependency on the libfltk1.1 development package.
> >
> > As htmlgen has entered the archives in 1998 at revision 2.1 and
> > furthermore has no (Build-)Depends on anything fltk-like, I suppose
> > this was meant for another package...?
> >
> > Unfortunately it eludes me which package this might be.
>
> sorry, htmldoc ... should'nt file bug report after midnight.
>

Reassigning now and CCing the maintainer of htmldoc so he gets aware
of this.

HTH,
Flo

[Debian Bug Importer (debzilla)]

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 23:51:41 +0200
From: Florian Ernst <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: package built in old build-env, needs better build-deps

--smOfPzt+Qjm5bNGJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 00:20:27 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: htmlgen
> Version: 1.8.24-1
> Severity: serious
>=20
> please build in a current unstable build environment, tighten the
> build dependency on the libfltk1.1 development package.

As htmlgen has entered the archives in 1998 at revision 2.1 and
furthermore has no (Build-)Depends on anything fltk-like, I suppose
this was meant for another package...?

Unfortunately it eludes me which package this might be.

Cheers,
Flo

--smOfPzt+Qjm5bNGJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDIgPts3U+TVFLPnwRAqTNAJ9Of6roXdZVQhKHOlymMSdodsXR1ACfRn5Y
/57VuOfOD0LL8QmoOBuy8j8=
=iWJY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--smOfPzt+Qjm5bNGJ--

[Debian Bug Importer (debzilla)]

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 00:11:31 +0200
From: Matthias Klose <email address hidden>
To: Florian Ernst <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#320720: package built in old build-env, needs better build-deps

Florian Ernst writes:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 00:20:27 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Package: htmlgen
> > Version: 1.8.24-1
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > please build in a current unstable build environment, tighten the
> > build dependency on the libfltk1.1 development package.
>
> As htmlgen has entered the archives in 1998 at revision 2.1 and
> furthermore has no (Build-)Depends on anything fltk-like, I suppose
> this was meant for another package...?
>
> Unfortunately it eludes me which package this might be.

sorry, htmldoc ... should'nt file bug report after midnight.

[Debian Bug Importer (debzilla)]

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 00:19:58 +0200
From: Florian Ernst <email address hidden>
To: Jeff Licquia <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#320720: package built in old build-env, needs better build-deps

--X+nYw8KZ/oNxZ8JS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

reassign 320720 htmldoc
thanks control@b.d.o BCCed

On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:11:31AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Florian Ernst writes:
> > On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 00:20:27 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > Package: htmlgen
> > > Version: 1.8.24-1
> > > Severity: serious
> > >=20
> > > please build in a current unstable build environment, tighten the
> > > build dependency on the libfltk1.1 development package.
> >=20
> > As htmlgen has entered the archives in 1998 at revision 2.1 and
> > furthermore has no (Build-)Depends on anything fltk-like, I suppose
> > this was meant for another package...?
> >=20
> > Unfortunately it eludes me which package this might be.
>=20
> sorry, htmldoc ... should'nt file bug report after midnight.
>=20

Reassigning now and CCing the maintainer of htmldoc so he gets aware
of this.

HTH,
Flo

--X+nYw8KZ/oNxZ8JS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDIgqOs3U+TVFLPnwRAg0HAJ9di4OoLcMduJUTHWXjCYLiRceYEQCfTF4B
VSoTqJRdkJ7indA16tFjcSY=
=hR1R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--X+nYw8KZ/oNxZ8JS--

[Jeff Licquia (jeff-licquia)]

I can confirm that the only binary htmldoc packages I have built (i386)
were built on an unstable system updated that day. The current version,
1.8.24-2, appears to be fine on all architectures besides arm and
powerpc, which appear to be out of date. The problems with arm seem to
be caused by a lag in the C++ migration, and the powerpc problem seems
to be in libpng instead of htmldoc.

Perhaps the autobuilders for those two architectures could be persuaded
to try again, since they haven't tried in over a month.

In the meantime, given that htmldoc does build properly with any version
of fltk 1.1 that is provided, perhaps you could explain what is wrong
with the build dependency that is there.

Thanks.

[Debian Bug Importer (debzilla)]

Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:29:16 -0500
From: Jeff Licquia <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Don't understand the problem

I can confirm that the only binary htmldoc packages I have built (i386)
were built on an unstable system updated that day. The current version,
1.8.24-2, appears to be fine on all architectures besides arm and
powerpc, which appear to be out of date. The problems with arm seem to
be caused by a lag in the C++ migration, and the powerpc problem seems
to be in libpng instead of htmldoc.

Perhaps the autobuilders for those two architectures could be persuaded
to try again, since they haven't tried in over a month.

In the meantime, given that htmldoc does build properly with any version
of fltk 1.1 that is provided, perhaps you could explain what is wrong
with the build dependency that is there.

Thanks.

[Matthias Klose (doko-cs)]

Jeff Licquia writes:
> I can confirm that the only binary htmldoc packages I have built (i386)
> were built on an unstable system updated that day. The current version,
> 1.8.24-2, appears to be fine on all architectures besides arm and
> powerpc, which appear to be out of date. The problems with arm seem to
> be caused by a lag in the C++ migration, and the powerpc problem seems
> to be in libpng instead of htmldoc.
>
> Perhaps the autobuilders for those two architectures could be persuaded
> to try again, since they haven't tried in over a month.
>
> In the meantime, given that htmldoc does build properly with any version
> of fltk 1.1 that is provided, perhaps you could explain what is wrong
> with the build dependency that is there.

The problem was seen with -1 (the binary depending on libstdc++6 and
libfltk1.1c102). IMO it's still wrong to upload a package without
tightened version dependencies, before all depending C++ libraries are
in the archive for all architectures. If you want to do the upload,
without all architectures at the new fltk1.1 version, then you have to
tighten the build dependencies.

  Matthias

[Jeff Licquia (jeff-licquia)]

On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 07:46 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> The problem was seen with -1 (the binary depending on libstdc++6 and
> libfltk1.1c102). IMO it's still wrong to upload a package without
> tightened version dependencies, before all depending C++ libraries are
> in the archive for all architectures. If you want to do the upload,
> without all architectures at the new fltk1.1 version, then you have to
> tighten the build dependencies.

Yes, I recall the problem with -1. And I see your point. I prefer that
the build deps not lie, so stable people can use the source package for
as long as possible, but I should then wait for the library transition
to complete for all architectures.

I have a few other little things to clean up, so I will go ahead and do
a -3, which should fix all the problems (possibly modulo the powerpc
issue).

[Steve Langasek (vorlon)]

On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 12:54:30AM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 07:46 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > The problem was seen with -1 (the binary depending on libstdc++6 and
> > libfltk1.1c102). IMO it's still wrong to upload a package without
> > tightened version dependencies, before all depending C++ libraries are
> > in the archive for all architectures. If you want to do the upload,
> > without all architectures at the new fltk1.1 version, then you have to
> > tighten the build dependencies.

> Yes, I recall the problem with -1. And I see your point. I prefer that
> the build deps not lie, so stable people can use the source package for
> as long as possible, but I should then wait for the library transition
> to complete for all architectures.

> I have a few other little things to clean up, so I will go ahead and do
> a -3, which should fix all the problems (possibly modulo the powerpc
> issue).

htmldoc has been built on the ppc autobuilder now, FWIW.

--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
<email address hidden> http://www.debian.org/

[Debian Bug Importer (debzilla)]

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:46:11 +0200
From: Matthias Klose <email address hidden>
To: Jeff Licquia <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#320720: Don't understand the problem

Jeff Licquia writes:
> I can confirm that the only binary htmldoc packages I have built (i386)
> were built on an unstable system updated that day. The current version,
> 1.8.24-2, appears to be fine on all architectures besides arm and
> powerpc, which appear to be out of date. The problems with arm seem to
> be caused by a lag in the C++ migration, and the powerpc problem seems
> to be in libpng instead of htmldoc.
>
> Perhaps the autobuilders for those two architectures could be persuaded
> to try again, since they haven't tried in over a month.
>
> In the meantime, given that htmldoc does build properly with any version
> of fltk 1.1 that is provided, perhaps you could explain what is wrong
> with the build dependency that is there.

The problem was seen with -1 (the binary depending on libstdc++6 and
libfltk1.1c102). IMO it's still wrong to upload a package without
tightened version dependencies, before all depending C++ libraries are
in the archive for all architectures. If you want to do the upload,
without all architectures at the new fltk1.1 version, then you have to
tighten the build dependencies.

  Matthias

[Debian Bug Importer (debzilla)]

Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 00:54:30 -0500
From: Jeff Licquia <email address hidden>
To: Matthias Klose <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#320720: Don't understand the problem

On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 07:46 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> The problem was seen with -1 (the binary depending on libstdc++6 and
> libfltk1.1c102). IMO it's still wrong to upload a package without
> tightened version dependencies, before all depending C++ libraries are
> in the archive for all architectures. If you want to do the upload,
> without all architectures at the new fltk1.1 version, then you have to
> tighten the build dependencies.

Yes, I recall the problem with -1. And I see your point. I prefer that
the build deps not lie, so stable people can use the source package for
as long as possible, but I should then wait for the library transition
to complete for all architectures.

I have a few other little things to clean up, so I will go ahead and do
a -3, which should fix all the problems (possibly modulo the powerpc
issue).

[Debian Bug Importer (debzilla)]

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 00:50:10 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <email address hidden>
To: Jeff Licquia <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Cc: Matthias Klose <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#320720: Don't understand the problem

--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 12:54:30AM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 07:46 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > The problem was seen with -1 (the binary depending on libstdc++6 and
> > libfltk1.1c102). IMO it's still wrong to upload a package without
> > tightened version dependencies, before all depending C++ libraries are
> > in the archive for all architectures. If you want to do the upload,
> > without all architectures at the new fltk1.1 version, then you have to
> > tighten the build dependencies.

> Yes, I recall the problem with -1. And I see your point. I prefer that
> the build deps not lie, so stable people can use the source package for
> as long as possible, but I should then wait for the library transition
> to complete for all architectures.

> I have a few other little things to clean up, so I will go ahead and do
> a -3, which should fix all the problems (possibly modulo the powerpc
> issue).

htmldoc has been built on the ppc autobuilder now, FWIW.

--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
<email address hidden> http://www.debian.org/

--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDKSeyKN6ufymYLloRAnGcAJ41hNUtTXQW5h6lHERwjxG5LOQhRQCfWGkt
NPvpsEVeSKUhJK9q6Xk34Qw=
=Nmpv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q--

[Steve Langasek (vorlon)]

Since htmldoc 1.8.24-2 is in testing just fine on all archs, with a
dependency on the new libfltk1.1c102 everywhere, the reason for a versioned
build-dependency is past; I think this bug can just be closed.

Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
<email address hidden> http://www.debian.org/

[Debian Bug Importer (debzilla)]

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:06:18 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: package built in old build-env, needs better build-deps

--gwtGiOGliFx8mAnm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Since htmldoc 1.8.24-2 is in testing just fine on all archs, with a
dependency on the new libfltk1.1c102 everywhere, the reason for a versioned
build-dependency is past; I think this bug can just be closed.

Cheers,
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
<email address hidden> http://www.debian.org/

--gwtGiOGliFx8mAnm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDwl/KKN6ufymYLloRAnxRAKDSen6lzoBqjPb7UjVFzHorkmCrlwCgn3Jw
X3/Wg/vcUFgr+F1OPB5Eqqo=
=ssCy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gwtGiOGliFx8mAnm--