baloo_file crashed with SIGSEGV in start_thread()

Bug #1968725 reported by Leo
18
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
baloo-kf5 (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: baloo-kf5 5.92.0-0ubuntu1
Uname: Linux 5.17.2-051702-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu80
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Tue Apr 12 14:56:27 2022
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexec/baloo_file
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libexec/baloo_file
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
 LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LANGUAGE=de:en_US
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: baloo-kf5
StacktraceTop:
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libQt5Core.so.5
 start_thread (arg=<optimized out>) at ./nptl/pthread_create.c:442
Title: baloo_file crashed with SIGSEGV in start_thread()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dialout dip fax floppy lpadmin lxd operator plugdev root sambashare sudo sys tape users video
separator:

Revision history for this message
Leo (leo-heinz) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote :

StacktraceTop:
 std::__atomic_base<int>::load (__m=std::memory_order_relaxed, this=0x2b2b2b7370747468) at /usr/include/c++/11/bits/atomic_base.h:481
 QAtomicOps<int>::loadRelaxed<int> (_q_value=...) at /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtCore/qatomic_cxx11.h:239
 QBasicAtomicInteger<int>::loadRelaxed (this=0x2b2b2b7370747468) at /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtCore/qbasicatomic.h:107
 QtPrivate::RefCount::deref (this=0x2b2b2b7370747468) at /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtCore/qrefcount.h:66
 QString::~QString (this=<optimized out>, this=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtCore/qstring.h:1307

tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
Revision history for this message
Steve Beattie (sbeattie) wrote : Bug is not a security issue

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Private Security → Public
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in baloo-kf5 (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.