Jammy liblablgtk3-ocaml, liblablgtksourceview3-ocaml, liblablgtk3-ocaml-dev, and liblablgtksourceview3-ocaml-dev 3.1.2-1 report the wrong version

Bug #1964437 reported by Jason Gross
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
lablgtk3 (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

On March 4, [my Coq launchpad package succeeded with](https://launchpadlibrarian.net/589055712/buildlog_ubuntu-jammy-amd64.coq_8.master~git~202203042103+23110-0~daily375-aedb9bc5f3~ubuntu22.04.1_BUILDING.txt.gz)
```
LablGtk3 and LablGtkSourceView3 found (3.1.1), with native threads:
=> native CoqIDE will be built.
```
However, on March 8, [the same build script failed due to](https://launchpadlibrarian.net/589689507/buildlog_ubuntu-jammy-amd64.coq_8.master~git~202203082103+23112-0~daily375-a0df849836~ubuntu22.04.1_BUILDING.txt.gz)
```
LablGtk3 and LablGtkSourceView3 found ([unspecified]), but too old (required >= 3.1.0, found [unspecified]):
=> no CoqIDE will be built.
```
The difference is that liblablgtk3-ocaml, liblablgtksourceview3-ocaml, liblablgtk3-ocaml-dev, and liblablgtksourceview3-ocaml-dev got upgraded from 3.1.1+official-1build2 to 3.1.2-1. Apparently `ocamlfind query -format %v lablgtk3` now gives "[unspecified]" instead of a real version number.

Revision history for this message
Jason Gross (jgross-h) wrote :

There is a NixOS patch for this at https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/155871/files

Revision history for this message
Jason Gross (jgross-h) wrote :

See also https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lablgtk3/+bug/1897171 (I didn't realize I had already reported this two years ago...)

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.