file transfer with MSN is very slow and frequently does not compleate

Bug #196370 reported by mike hancock
14
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
KDE Network
Unknown
Wishlist
kdenetwork (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Wishlist
Unassigned

Bug Description

when sending a file with MSN the file transfer is _very_ slow and frequently does not complete at all.

kopete --version

Qt: 3.3.7
KDE: 3.5.9
Kopete: 0.12.7

Revision history for this message
In , Bugs-kde-org-g (bugs-kde-org-g) wrote :

Version: (using KDE KDE 3.5.1)
Installed from: Mandriva RPMs

I'm at home, I've no NAT and opened the required ports for proper MSN file transfer. But when testing file transfer of the same file using amsn and kopete, the file is generally much much slower to transfer using kopete (more than 10 times). I tested it both when sending and when receiving files. Is it because of the way kopete handle file transfer in msn (maybe it is an indirect connection) ?

Revision history for this message
In , Bugs-kde-org-g (bugs-kde-org-g) wrote :

I should add this behaviour is the same since quite a long time (maybe 6 months), the file transfer was much faster before (but what I say is quite subjective)

Revision history for this message
In , Chanika (chanika) wrote :

file transfer code has changed in 0.12... I think it might be faster
now. you could try the beta and see :)

--
This insane ranting was brought to you by evyl bananas, and the number 3.
www.chani3.com

Revision history for this message
In , Freebsd (freebsd) wrote :

Kopete doesn't have an implementation of P2P file transfers yet. All files go through the server and this is why they are much slower than in aMSN. There are plans to add P2P support, of course, but it will probably not happen in the 0.12 timeframe. The KDE4 release of Kopete is a much more likely target.

Revision history for this message
In , Bugs-kde-org-g (bugs-kde-org-g) wrote :

Thanks for having reformulated my idea with much more technical sense. KDE4 seems a reasonable target to me too. Reader, please, vote for this wish ! :) ()

Revision history for this message
In , csanchisb (csanchisb) wrote :

Kmess does have p2p transfers, would it be possible to just copy their implementation?

Revision history for this message
In , Paulo-fidalgo-pt (paulo-fidalgo-pt) wrote :

there's a new msn lib in the forge (libpappilon).
There maybe there's roof for implementation and improvements there... but off course if somebody make himself volunteer... this can happen any time ;)

Revision history for this message
In , Michael-larouche (michael-larouche) wrote :

*** Bug 133901 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Revision history for this message
In , Michael-larouche (michael-larouche) wrote :

*** Bug 134611 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Revision history for this message
In , Michael-larouche (michael-larouche) wrote :

*** Bug 121351 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Revision history for this message
In , Michael-larouche (michael-larouche) wrote :

*** Bug 128954 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Revision history for this message
In , Michael-larouche (michael-larouche) wrote :

*** Bug 126919 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Revision history for this message
In , Michael-larouche (michael-larouche) wrote :

*** Bug 132104 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Revision history for this message
In , Ernesto Ruge (the-infinity) wrote :

hmm ... my bug ( http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132104 ) was about the problem, that almost no file transfer works in MSN because it breaks after a while - what has this to do with this topic / wish?

Revision history for this message
In , Michael-larouche (michael-larouche) wrote :

Yes, this is about implementing MSN file transfer the correct way, not using the fallback MS server.

Revision history for this message
In , Ernesto Ruge (the-infinity) wrote :

dows orgininal MSN use P2P file transfer? I had also with original MSN Messenegr 7 a really bad connection (because of the slow MS server) - or has the live messenger implemented P2P transfer?

Revision history for this message
In , Matteo Croce (teknoraver) wrote :

can P2P work behind a NAT forwarding ports?

Revision history for this message
In , Mattfly-k (mattfly-k) wrote :

P2P doesn't work, never...

Revision history for this message
In , Francesco-doffizi (francesco-doffizi) wrote :

I notice really great differences between original msn and kopete in filetransfer (I've got a not configurable NAT so relay transfer is mandatory).
With kopete it's really slow while with msn is quite good! So implementation is still quite different... If I remember well I get good results even with AMSN... see its code!

Revision history for this message
In , Fredrile+kdebug (fredrile+kdebug) wrote :

Use aMSN guys, its way ahead on MSN in so many ways =)

Revision history for this message
In , Lameventanas (lameventanas) wrote :

Is there any plan to solve this before KDE 4.0?
I am afraid that even if it is solved in KDE 4.0, there will be brand new bugs because of all the new changes, and we'll never have a usable version.

Revision history for this message
In , Francesco-doffizi (francesco-doffizi) wrote :

It's so frustrating that a bug filed over (and over) a year ago is still open, quite ignored. If mantainer has no time to follow this task he could ask some sort of help. Even thinking that correct code exists in an other gpl software (aMSN) shouldn't be so hard to port to kopete.

Hope this will be solved some way soon ...

Revision history for this message
In , X-wstephenson (x-wstephenson) wrote :

No, it won't be added in 4.0. The maintainer has no time. We welcome help for 4.1.

Revision history for this message
In , Mattfly-k (mattfly-k) wrote :

I was in #kopete irc.freenode.net channel some months ago, and developers told me that msn p2p file transfer would be available in 4.0. So isn't that true, officially?

Revision history for this message
In , X-wstephenson (x-wstephenson) wrote :

Plans change, it is now delayed from 4.0

Revision history for this message
mike hancock (javaiscoolmike) wrote :

acording to this page:
http://<email address hidden>/msg01222.html
...
"Kopete doesn't have an implementation of P2P file transfers yet. All files go
through the server and this is why they are much slower than in aMSN. There are
plans to add P2P support, of course, but it will probably not happen in the
0.12 timeframe. The KDE4 release of Kopete is a much more likely target."

Revision history for this message
mike hancock (javaiscoolmike) wrote :

this sound like the same bug too:
http://www.progressive-comp.com/?l=kopete-devel&m=117718000701220&w=2
...
"------- Additional Comments From slaout linux62 org 2007-04-21 20:26 -------
I also have the same problem in 0.12.4 when receiving files from Windows Live \
Messenger.

Downloading is slow (for any file I download and upload), the progressbar seams to \
pause sometimes and after a few seconds (for "large" files of 1 Mb or so) it stops: \
the progressbar on my side do not advance anymore while my friend see a message that \
there has been an error during transfert (or that I canceled). \
_______________________________________________ kopete-devel mailing list"

Revision history for this message
In , Matteo Croce (teknoraver) wrote :

4.1 will be out in april IIRC, is the fix postponed to kde 4.2?

Revision history for this message
In , FiNeX (finex) wrote :

@Matteo: 4.1 is planned for july, not for april.

Revision history for this message
In , Pablo Montepagano (pmontepagano) wrote :

anyway... when are you going to do this? this is a VERY old bug.

Revision history for this message
In , Matteo Croce (teknoraver) wrote :

Postponed to kde 5.0

Revision history for this message
In , Nienhueser (nienhueser) wrote :

There are no plans to postpone to or implement it for a specific release, so please ignore the comment above.

Revision history for this message
In , Pablo Montepagano (pmontepagano) wrote :

I think that the irony was evident. If I knew how to code, I would do it myself. Instead, I had to migrate to emesene. However, it´s not as good as Kopete, since it has some bugs, and it only supports MSNP.

Revision history for this message
Andries (andries-spies) wrote :

I don't mind if they fix this in KDE 4. Just that this fix should also be back-ported to KDE 3.5. I don't see me using KDE 4 soon (not until it actually becomes stable, and usefull). Wonder if this "bug" has been solved in Pidgin. It may be time to ditch Kopete if this is the case.

Revision history for this message
In , Matteo Croce (teknoraver) wrote :

Please change severity to normal:
"regular issue, some loss of functionality under specific circumstances"

Revision history for this message
In , Tiago Marques (t28427) wrote :

Look(In reply to comment #31)
> Please change severity to normal:
> "regular issue, some loss of functionality under specific circumstances"
>

Look, i don't know for how long, years maybe, that I can't transfer a big file over MSN network with kopete. By big I mean more than 1MB!
I don't know if it's the lack of the P2P transfer, but slow or fast, it doesn't work right.
This IS IMPORTANT. How can someone expect to have kopete as a valid option, if it can't do one of the most useful MSN features right?
Best regards

Revision history for this message
In , Ivovh (ivovh) wrote :

(In reply to comment #32)
> This IS IMPORTANT. How can someone expect to have kopete as a valid option, if
> it can't do one of the most useful MSN features right?

Exactly! This is not just "some loss of functionality under specific circumstances", this is a *fundamental* feature of MSN that *never* works. A lot of people (including me) have been forced to switch to all kinds of horrible IM clients, just because Kopete doesn't fully implement the MSN protocols.

Revision history for this message
In , Manwesulimo2004 (manwesulimo2004) wrote :

Amen!!! This issue is vital. I know so many people who use alternative messengers because of this one issue. If the devs could get this fixed I'm sure it would make Kopete much more popular.

Revision history for this message
In , kriko (kristjan-ugrin) wrote :

I agree.
Transfers are slow and most of times they don't finish properly.

Revision history for this message
In , Theresa (theresa) wrote :

the sad truth is I already moved onto Skype, because they DO file transfers with a proper speed, and with details on the file transfers (e.g Size of the File, Name/Location of the File, ETA, etc.....)
that's what I imagine file transfers to do....I was once told in the IRC kopete chat, that this will be worked on for KDE 4 (Kopete). But apparently it wasn't really?!

No offense to the KDE/Kopete Developers, I'm sure you're doing a good job, I'm just trying to point things out!

Revision history for this message
In , Matteo Croce (teknoraver) wrote :

anyone is working on it?

Revision history for this message
In , Kde-w (kde-w) wrote :

moving this wish to the WLM plugin

Daniel T Chen (crimsun)
Changed in kopete:
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
In , Pablo Montepagano (pmontepagano) wrote :

I wasn't able to test the SVN version of Kopete. KDE 4 compiles have brought several package collisions with the KDE 3 branch.

However, I would like to know if P2P transfers have been succesfully solved in the new WLM plugin. And, most specially, if that plugin will ever be backported to the 0.12 branch (Qt 3). My system is rather old and KDE4 is a big burden to my resources.

Changed in kopete:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
status: Confirmed → Triaged
Changed in kdenetwork:
status: Unknown → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
In , Mattfly-k (mattfly-k) wrote :

I think the new WLM plugin could be make available in the stable as option, you can choose between standard-old kopete MSN protocol and the new one, the WLM plugin. Hoping that WLM may work with p2p-file-transfer.

Revision history for this message
In , Adrián Chaves (gallaecio) wrote :

As someone said before, KMess already uses the new protocol, or at least makes file transfers really fast. Probably the way to make it posible would be talking to KMess developers.

Revision history for this message
In , Dario Andres (andresbajotierra) wrote :

*** Bug 193250 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Revision history for this message
Harald Sitter (apachelogger) wrote :

Closing this bug in favor of the one on bugs.kde.org, please follow the KDE bug instead.

Changed in kdenetwork (Ubuntu):
status: Triaged → Invalid
Changed in kdenetwork:
importance: Unknown → Wishlist
Revision history for this message
In , Andrew-crouthamel (andrew-crouthamel) wrote :

Hi there, sorry for the bad news, but WLM has been discontinued by Microsoft, so this bug will be closed.

Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone!

Changed in kdenetwork:
status: Confirmed → Unknown
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Related questions

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.