Please sync schroedinger 1.0.0-1 from debian/unstable

Bug #195374 reported by Sebastian Dröge
8
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
schroedinger (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Wishlist
Unassigned

Bug Description

Hi,
it would be nice if schroedinger could be updated to version 1.0.0 for hardy. This version is the first version that is conform to the final, frozen Dirac bitstream spec. Older versions created invalid files, thus we should either update or remove it from the archive for hardy.

Unfortunately this new version needs liboil 0.3.13, for which I've filed another bug.

Attached is the changelog from 0.9.0 to 1.0.0 and a diffstat.

For updating we can simply sync from Debian/unstable.

Revision history for this message
Sebastian Dröge (slomo) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Sebastian Dröge (slomo) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Sebastian Dröge (slomo) wrote :

See bug #195376 for liboil.

Revision history for this message
Cesare Tirabassi (norsetto) wrote :

For what you are saying it would make sense to me to update. Is there any impact on packages which depends on schroedinger and liboil?

gstreamer0.10-schroedinger
Reverse Depends:
  oggconvert

liboil0.3
Reverse Depends:
  gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad
  swfdec-mozilla
  swfdec-gnome
  python-vipscc
  nip2
  libvips12
  libvips-tools
  libswfdec-0.5-4
  libschroedinger-0.9-0
  gstreamer0.10-schroedinger
  gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly
  gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad
  gstreamer0.10-fluendo-mp3
  gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg
  pulseaudio-module-gconf
  pulseaudio
  libpulsecore5
  gstreamer0.10-plugins-good
  gstreamer0.10-plugins-base

liboil0.3-dev
Reverse Depends:
  libvips-dev
  libswfdec-0.5-dev

Revision history for this message
Sebastian Dröge (slomo) wrote :

Well, for schroedinger it doesn't matter much as only the gstreamer plugin is used by other packages and this didn't change API or anything.

For liboil it's another story unfortunately, it didn't change API (except from additions) but I can't gurarantuee that it works on other CPUs than mine without problems. In the past it had some bugs, caused by wrong usage of some instructions or broken CPU detection and at least for ARM there are some bugs in the new version (which of course doesn't matter for Ubuntu).
Also it would be nice to get some wider testing before... I'll upload a package in a few minutes and call for testing in IRC.

Whatever, I know of a single person until now where liboil crashes, that might have some other reasons though... still not good I guess :)

Revision history for this message
Sebastian Dröge (slomo) wrote :
Revision history for this message
StefanPotyra (sistpoty) wrote :

Hm... I guess I'm in favor of getting this in, since the problematic part is liboil here. So if liboil makes it, +1 from me.

Revision history for this message
Scott Kitterman (kitterman) wrote :

We'll need all the FFe information for liboil too.

Revision history for this message
Luke Yelavich (themuso) wrote :

liboil is in main, so I guess thats something for the ubuntu-release team to take care of.

Revision history for this message
Sebastian Dröge (slomo) wrote :

For liboil see bug #195376.

Revision history for this message
Cesare Tirabassi (norsetto) wrote :

Since liboil was approved this is a +1 from me too, confirmed. Thanks.

Changed in schroedinger:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Sebastian Dröge (slomo) wrote :

Ok, making this a sync request now.

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

new version synced

Changed in schroedinger:
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.