compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV in _nv000069gl()

Bug #190232 reported by Bigbiz
44
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: compiz

In Hardy I set my town in clock applet (gnome)

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: amd64
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Fri Feb 8 17:49:45 2008
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/compiz.real
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: compiz-core 1:0.7.0-0ubuntu1
PackageArchitecture: amd64
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/compiz.real --ignore-desktop-hints --replace --loose-binding --sm-client-id default0 ccp
ProcCwd: /home/marta
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=/home/marta/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
 LANG=it_IT.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: compiz
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libGLcore.so.1
 _nv000069gl () from /usr/lib/libGLcore.so.1
 ?? () from /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
Title: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV in _nv000069gl()
Uname: Linux marta-delpiero 2.6.24-5-generic #1 SMP Thu Jan 24 19:29:14 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin netdev plugdev scanner video

Revision history for this message
Bigbiz (markozz) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Symbolic stack trace

StacktraceTop:?? ()
?? ()
?? ()
?? ()
?? ()

Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Symbolic threaded stack trace
Revision history for this message
Pedro Villavicencio (pedro) wrote :

Thanks for your bug report. Please try to obtain a backtrace http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash and attach the file to the bug report. This will greatly help us in tracking down your problem.

Changed in compiz:
importance: Undecided → Medium
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
wolfger (wolfger) wrote :

Over 5 months with no response. We are closing this bug report because it lacks the information we need to investigate the problem, as described in the previous comments. Please reopen it if you can give us the missing information, and don't hesitate to submit bug reports in the future. To reopen the bug report you can click on the current status, under the Status column, and change the Status back to "New". Thanks again!

Changed in linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24:
status: Incomplete → Invalid
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.