Gnome Shell crashes with SIGSEGV in get_top_visible_window_actor → meta_compositor_sync_stack → meta_stack_tracker_sync_stack → stack_tracker_sync_stack_later → call_later_func
Bug #1856425 reported by
Teo
This bug report is a duplicate of:
Bug #1857947: gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in get_top_visible_window_actor() from meta_compositor_sync_stack() from meta_stack_tracker_sync_stack() from stack_tracker_sync_stack_later() from call_later_func().
Edit
Remove
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
gnome-shell (Ubuntu) |
New
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Ubuntu 19.10, all updated, sporadically (both in terms of timing and as an app I use), the gnome session crashs and re-opened by itself after about 1 second. However, closing the apps I was using, so as to lose everything. Now, just happened I saved all the logs via gnome logs, of 2 episodes where the problem occurred. It happened at a distance of not even a quarter of an hour. It's happened at 16.35 and 16.48. In attached this log. I can see only "bluetoothd: Failed to set mode: Blocked through rfkill (0x12)" of relevant, in both times, but I don't know.
To post a comment you must log in.
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It sounds like some part of the system has crashed. To help us find the cause of the crash please follow these steps:
1. Look in /var/crash for crash files and if found run:
ubuntu-bug YOURFILE.crash
Then tell us the ID of the newly-created bug.
2. If step 1 failed then look at https:/ /errors. ubuntu. com/user/ ID where ID is the content of file /var/lib/ whoopsie/ whoopsie- id on the machine. Do you find any links to recent problems on that page? If so then please send the links to us.
3. If step 2 also failed then apply the workaround from bug 994921, reboot, reproduce the crash, and retry step 1.
Please take care to avoid attaching .crash files to bugs as we are unable to process them as file attachments. It would also be a security risk for yourself.