Running geometric optimizer after stitcher producing drastically different result
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hugin |
Invalid
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
The more detailed summary: running geometric optimizer after stitcher, but on the same input data produces drastically different result.
The testcase uses the same input data as in bug #1856336. The system is the same and the instructions to download input data are the same. Input data and evidence can be found under https:/
As in bug #1856336 the 8 input .NEF files were imported the usual way through the "Photos" window - see 'photos_window.png' file in the above web folder.
Then control points were detected automatically - see the 'photos_window.png' file for details.
Then geometric optimizer was run - see the 'photos_window.png' file for details. The optimizer produced a report - see 'first_
Then photometric optimizer was then run.
Then "Stitcher" tab was clicked and stitcher parameters were set - see 'stitcher_
When stitcher finished its run again "Photos" tab was clicked and in it geometric optimizer was run again (by clicking its "Calculate" button). The second run produced a different from the first run result - see 'second_
The control point error distances are calculated in the output space. When you change the output size (or projection), it is expected that the cp error distance changes. (This is a design decision in the underlying panotools library.)