Ubuntu's evolution-data-server package incompatible with gnome-calendar package

Bug #1846759 reported by Chris Graham
10
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gnome-calendar (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

On reporting an issue in gnome-calendar, I was told "GNOME Calendar 3.34 requires EDS 3.34 running in the host system.". Ubuntu has 3.32.

See:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/issues/464#note_617797

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.04
Package: gnome-calendar 3.32.2-1~ubuntu19.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.0.0-29.31-generic 5.0.21
Uname: Linux 5.0.0-29-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu27.1
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Fri Oct 4 08:00:32 2019
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-07-31 (64 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.04 "Disco Dingo" - Release amd64 (20190416)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gnome-calendar
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
modified.conffile..etc.default.apport: [modified]
mtime.conffile..etc.default.apport: 2019-09-22T11:01:00.065291

Revision history for this message
Chris Graham (chrisgraham) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in gnome-calendar (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

Thank you for your bug report, but from your description
 Package: gnome-calendar 3.32.2-1~ubuntu19.04.1

You are using 3.32 which is what the 19.04 serie is providing, or are you using the flatpak as mentioned in the upstream report? (in which case it's a bug in the flatpak and not Ubuntu)

Changed in gnome-calendar (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Low
status: Confirmed → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Chris Graham (chrisgraham) wrote :

Ergh, you're right. It is the other guy in the Gnome thread using 3.34, not me. I should have checked my own version rather than running with what was said in there.

I've now mentioned this on the Gnome issue tracker thread.

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

Thanks, I'm marking the report invalid since there is no actual e-d-s version mismatch there.

Changed in gnome-calendar (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Invalid
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.