New Recurring Fine Rule fields need to be put back in more user-friendly order
Bug #1839874 reported by
Erica Rohlfs
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evergreen |
Confirmed
|
Low
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Evergreen Version 3.3
Administration -> Server Administration -> Circulation Recurring Fine Rules -> click New Recurring Fine Rule button
In previous versions of Evergreen, when creating a new recurring fine rule, the fields were displayed as name, recurrence_
In 3.3 the order of the fields is: high, id, low, name, normal, recurrence_
The order in 3.3 isn't entirely user-friendly. While I'm not particular to what order the grace period and recurrence interval should fall under, it would make sense to have the low, normal, and high fields remain grouped together (as they were in previous versions).
description: | updated |
Changed in evergreen: | |
importance: | Undecided → Low |
To post a comment you must log in.
See bug #1839881