instance's vm-state becomes error when cold-migrate instance to same host failed

Bug #1811235 reported by David Li
16
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
OpenStack Compute (nova)
Fix Released
Medium
Matt Riedemann
Queens
Confirmed
Medium
Unassigned
Rocky
Confirmed
Medium
Unassigned
Stein
Fix Committed
Medium
Matt Riedemann

Bug Description

step 1: boot a simple instance
step 2: stop the running instance which is booted in step 1
step 3: migrate the instance to same host,but the driver in the host doesn't support migrate to same host
step 4: nova show uuid(instance uuid), the instance's vm-state becomes error, and the fault show {"message": "Unable to migrate instance ( instance uuid) to current host (hostname)
step 5: nova instance-action-list uuid(instance uuid), you will see migrate error.

David Li (ldone)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brin Zhang (zhangbailin) wrote :

@David Li, which branch of nova with this issue?

On master, if you cold migrate the server to the same host, it's not set the server to error status. see [1].

[1] https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/compute/api.py#L3530

Revision history for this message
David Li (ldone) wrote :

Dear Brin, I feel so sorry for replying too late.
I found this issue in private cloud, and also I found Ocata version of nova (15.1.5 release) may have this issue after reading its code. The key codes in nova/compute/manager.py --> class ComputeManager --> prep_resize --> _error_out_instance_on_exception.

Besides, I have some questions. First, why the latest version of nova not supports migrating instance to same host event through some drivers support that function..Second, if there is any problem when user migrates instance without migration destination host but there is just one compute node.

tags: added: compute
Revision history for this message
Balazs Gibizer (balazs-gibizer) wrote :

To answer your question: Nova has a config option allow_resize_to_same_host that is False by default. If it is False the nova does not allow migrating or resize an instance to the host it is already on. So latest nova still supports migrating to the same host if configuration allows it.

Revision history for this message
David Li (ldone) wrote :

@BalazsGibizer, thank you for you reply. I saw the config option allow_resize_to_same_host. However, that config makes no sense since I want to migrate to selfhost because exception.CannotMigrateToSameHost will be raised in the beginning of function resize.see [1].

[1] https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/compute/api.py#L3530

Revision history for this message
melanie witt (melwitt) wrote :

David, thanks for the code link.

It looks like indeed, this change introduced a regression that causes CONF.allow_resize_to_same_host not to work any longer:

https://review.openstack.org/408955

Revision history for this message
melanie witt (melwitt) wrote :

Actually, looking at the code further [1], the docstring says that the host_name variable will only be set when the user has specified a target host for a cold migration. So, a resize without a target host specified will be able to land on the same host if CONF.allow_resize_to_same_host = True. BUT, a resize with a target host specified will be rejected. Prior to that change, it was not possible to specify a target host during a resize, at all.

David, you are specifying a target host in your resize command, I assume?

I'm unsure if the code was written intentionally to reject self host, given CONF.allow_resize_to_same_host. We should discuss this with the wider team and find out more about the original target host feature.

[1] https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/9419c3e05499e55beda93d664197a7b0f0011ff7/nova/compute/api.py#L3524-L3525

Revision history for this message
David Li (ldone) wrote :

Dear melaniewitt, I just do cold-migrate with same target host specified in my command but resize.

Revision history for this message
Matt Riedemann (mriedem) wrote :

Resize does not allow specifying a target host at all. Specifying a target host only applies (in that code) for cold migrate:

https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/#resize-server-resize-action

https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/#migrate-server-migrate-action

The host parameter was added in the 2.56 microversion.

The allow_resize_to_same_host option really only makes sense for resize when the flavor changes. For cold migrate the flavor does not change, so what is the point of cold migrating a server to the same host?

As noted earlier, the cold migration might just fail in that case anyway if the virt driver doesn't support it:

https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/9419c3e05499e55beda93d664197a7b0f0011ff7/nova/compute/manager.py#L4172

It looks like the only driver that does support cold migrate to the same host is the vcenter driver (because that is a cluster driver where the single nova-compute manages a single vcenter cluster which could have hundreds of ESXi hosts on it).

Are you using the vcenter driver in your deployment?

Revision history for this message
Matt Riedemann (mriedem) wrote :

I don't see where UnableToMigrateToSelf would eventually set the instance to error status, either in the compute manager prep_resize flow or in conductor if it tried to reschedule to another host. The fault does come from the compute manager recording UnableToMigrateToSelf as a fault.

Revision history for this message
Matt Riedemann (mriedem) wrote :

Oh yes I see:

https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/ocata/nova/compute/manager.py#L3798

That catches the UnableToMigrateToSelf because it doesn't reschedule and re-raises UnableToMigrateToSelf from _prep_resize which then sets the instance to error status:

https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/ocata/nova/compute/manager.py#L6801

That exception handler is kind of a pain - we have similar issues with rebuild failing and setting the instance to error status when it probably shouldn't.

In this case we should probably raise InstanceFaultRollback when we hit UnableToMigrateToSelf but even that would set the instance status back to active which it's not in this case (they resized a stopped VM).

And yes that code still exists on master...so this is a valid bug, but has less to do with the 2.56 microversion.

Changed in nova:
status: New → Triaged
importance: Undecided → Medium
importance: Medium → Low
Revision history for this message
Matt Riedemann (mriedem) wrote :

I'm going to mark this low severity because it should be rare to get into this scenario if you're doing a cold migrate. The scheduler should filter out the instance.host unless the allow_resize_to_same_host config option is True (which I guess it is in this case), but even then if you had more compute hosts in your deployment then we should be able to reschedule to another host (unless they are all full). And even if you do hit this, nothing changed with the underlying VM so you can reset the state using this API:

https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/#reset-server-state-os-resetstate-action

Although that only allows you to set the instance status to active or error (it's already in error status, and the guest isn't running so it's not active either. If you reset to active then the compute manager should automatically stop it via the _sync_power_states periodic task). I'm not sure why we don't allow more sets in the resetState API (like stopped).

Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Related fix proposed to nova (master)

Related fix proposed to branch: master
Review: https://review.openstack.org/633212

Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Fix proposed to nova (master)

Fix proposed to branch: master
Review: https://review.openstack.org/633227

Changed in nova:
assignee: nobody → Matt Riedemann (mriedem)
status: Triaged → In Progress
Matt Riedemann (mriedem)
Changed in nova:
importance: Low → Medium
Revision history for this message
Matt Riedemann (mriedem) wrote :

Per comment 2:

> Dear Brin, I feel so sorry for replying too late.
> I found this issue in private cloud, and also I found Ocata version of nova (15.1.5 release) may
> have this issue after reading its code. The key codes in nova/compute/manager.py --> class
> ComputeManager --> prep_resize --> _error_out_instance_on_exception.

This is the latent bug from Ocata (and probably earlier). My patches above should fix this bug.

> Besides, I have some questions. First, why the latest version of nova not supports migrating
> instance to same host event through some drivers support that function..Second, if there is any
> problem when user migrates instance without migration destination host but there is just one
> compute node.

This looks like a regression with the 2.56 microversion in the API code, which was added in Queens. As we can tell from the vmware driver's supports_migrate_to_same_host=True capability, we know that at least one compute driver supports cold migrating to the same compute service host and the API should probably allow that. It kind of makes sense for vmware since you could have a single nova-compute service hosting a single vcenter cluster which has 1000 ESXi hosts in it, so your only option to cold migrate is to that same compute host (but underlying vcenter would actually cold migrate to another ESXi host in the cluster).

That regression in 2.56 is a separate bug though in my opinion.

Revision history for this message
Matt Riedemann (mriedem) wrote :

Bug 1819216 is related to this.

Revision history for this message
melanie witt (melwitt) wrote :

At a high level, I agree it makes sense not to go into ERROR state if a cold migrate to self fails, but ERROR state + fault message is generally "the way" that nova communicates failure of an action upon an instance. The end user sees the ERROR state and looks at the fault message to discover that something was not successful.

If we remove going to ERROR state, how will the end user know that their instance did not succeed in the migration? The instance actions API policy defaults to admin-only. Is there some other way the end user can discover the migration was not successful?

Revision history for this message
Matt Riedemann (mriedem) wrote :

@melanie, I've replied to your questions from comment 16 in the code review:

https://review.opendev.org/#/c/633227/7/nova/compute/manager.py@4355

Revision history for this message
Matt Riedemann (mriedem) wrote :

Also note that setting the instance to ERROR just to see the fault means that to reset the status on the instance, if you use the resetState API your only options are ACTIVE or ERROR. But if I'm resizing from a STOPPED server and we go to ERROR state just to see a fault, then resetting the instance to ACTIVE is a lie since the guest is really stopped - the power state sync task in the compute should eventually correct that, but it's still annoyingly wrong.

I think in general we should avoid setting instances to ERROR status if we can help it, i.e. nothing really changed about the power state of the instance, it's data, or related resources (volumes, ports, etc).

The instance actions API is the way to track the details of an operation performed on a server and it's not admin-only.

Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Related fix proposed to nova (stable/stein)

Related fix proposed to branch: stable/stein
Review: https://review.opendev.org/666638

Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Fix proposed to nova (stable/stein)

Fix proposed to branch: stable/stein
Review: https://review.opendev.org/666639

Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Related fix merged to nova (master)

Reviewed: https://review.opendev.org/633212
Committed: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/commit/?id=46cb2fdfe2df333d870aca8e6afc521172b8e061
Submitter: Zuul
Branch: master

commit 46cb2fdfe2df333d870aca8e6afc521172b8e061
Author: Matt Riedemann <email address hidden>
Date: Fri Jan 25 08:58:36 2019 -0500

    Change InstanceFaultRollback handling in _error_out_instance_on_exception

    For some reason, only NotImplementedError in _error_out_instance_on_exception
    would use the $instance_state parameter which can be controlled by the
    caller of the context manager to determine the rollback vm_state. But in the
    case of InstanceFaultRollback, the caller may want to reset the vm_state
    back to something other than ACTIVE, like if the instance is actually
    STOPPED and something like prep_resize fails (you can resize a STOPPED
    instance).

    This change makes _error_out_instance_on_exception handle InstanceFaultRollback
    like NotImplementedError in that the instance_state parameter is used to reset
    the instance.vm_state. It also adds a docstring explaining how this context
    manager works along with some notes/questions about ways to improve it.

    Change-Id: Ie4f9177f4d54cbc7dbcf58bd107fd5f24c60d8bb
    Related-Bug: #1811235

Changed in nova:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Fix merged to nova (master)

Reviewed: https://review.opendev.org/633227
Committed: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/commit/?id=d1931ac0630415519f9c3d906caba9c83cc8162a
Submitter: Zuul
Branch: master

commit d1931ac0630415519f9c3d906caba9c83cc8162a
Author: Matt Riedemann <email address hidden>
Date: Fri Jan 25 10:55:00 2019 -0500

    Raise InstanceFaultRollback for UnableToMigrateToSelf from _prep_resize

    It is possible to cold migrate a stopped server. If, however, the
    cold migrate is scheduled to the instance's current host and the
    compute driver does not support cold migrating to the same host,
    then UnableToMigrateToSelf was being raised from _prep_resize. If
    _reschedule_resize_or_reraise re-raises that exception, then
    _error_out_instance_on_exception in prep_resize handles it and
    sets the instance vm_state to ACTIVE. This is wrong since the
    instance power state is unchanged at this point and the instance
    is actually stopped.

    This fixes the problem by wrapping UnableToMigrateToSelf in
    InstanceFaultRollback and raises that from _prep_resize, and
    _error_out_instance_on_exception is called with the initial
    vm_state (STOPPED in this case) so when _error_out_instance_on_exception
    handles the InstanceFaultRollback exception it sets the instance
    vm_state to STOPPED (what it already was) rather than ACTIVE.

    There were no existing unit tests for the UnableToMigrateToSelf
    case in _prep_resize so those are added here.

    Change-Id: I17543ecb572934ecc7d0bbc7a4ad2f537fa499bc
    Closes-Bug: #1811235

Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Related fix merged to nova (stable/stein)

Reviewed: https://review.opendev.org/666638
Committed: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/commit/?id=cdaa80078491517af3143690d40d30a5b7591edf
Submitter: Zuul
Branch: stable/stein

commit cdaa80078491517af3143690d40d30a5b7591edf
Author: Matt Riedemann <email address hidden>
Date: Fri Jan 25 08:58:36 2019 -0500

    Change InstanceFaultRollback handling in _error_out_instance_on_exception

    For some reason, only NotImplementedError in _error_out_instance_on_exception
    would use the $instance_state parameter which can be controlled by the
    caller of the context manager to determine the rollback vm_state. But in the
    case of InstanceFaultRollback, the caller may want to reset the vm_state
    back to something other than ACTIVE, like if the instance is actually
    STOPPED and something like prep_resize fails (you can resize a STOPPED
    instance).

    This change makes _error_out_instance_on_exception handle InstanceFaultRollback
    like NotImplementedError in that the instance_state parameter is used to reset
    the instance.vm_state. It also adds a docstring explaining how this context
    manager works along with some notes/questions about ways to improve it.

    Change-Id: Ie4f9177f4d54cbc7dbcf58bd107fd5f24c60d8bb
    Related-Bug: #1811235
    (cherry picked from commit 46cb2fdfe2df333d870aca8e6afc521172b8e061)

tags: added: in-stable-stein
Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Fix merged to nova (stable/stein)

Reviewed: https://review.opendev.org/666639
Committed: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/commit/?id=1a11d5c7f35c17cfafc6b8ba57da88995c35b595
Submitter: Zuul
Branch: stable/stein

commit 1a11d5c7f35c17cfafc6b8ba57da88995c35b595
Author: Matt Riedemann <email address hidden>
Date: Fri Jan 25 10:55:00 2019 -0500

    Raise InstanceFaultRollback for UnableToMigrateToSelf from _prep_resize

    It is possible to cold migrate a stopped server. If, however, the
    cold migrate is scheduled to the instance's current host and the
    compute driver does not support cold migrating to the same host,
    then UnableToMigrateToSelf was being raised from _prep_resize. If
    _reschedule_resize_or_reraise re-raises that exception, then
    _error_out_instance_on_exception in prep_resize handles it and
    sets the instance vm_state to ACTIVE. This is wrong since the
    instance power state is unchanged at this point and the instance
    is actually stopped.

    This fixes the problem by wrapping UnableToMigrateToSelf in
    InstanceFaultRollback and raises that from _prep_resize, and
    _error_out_instance_on_exception is called with the initial
    vm_state (STOPPED in this case) so when _error_out_instance_on_exception
    handles the InstanceFaultRollback exception it sets the instance
    vm_state to STOPPED (what it already was) rather than ACTIVE.

    There were no existing unit tests for the UnableToMigrateToSelf
    case in _prep_resize so those are added here.

    Conflicts:
          nova/tests/unit/compute/test_compute_mgr.py

    NOTE(mriedem): The conflict is due to some unit tests from change
    I734cc01dce13f9e75a16639faf890ddb1661b7eb not being in Stein.

    Change-Id: I17543ecb572934ecc7d0bbc7a4ad2f537fa499bc
    Closes-Bug: #1811235
    (cherry picked from commit d1931ac0630415519f9c3d906caba9c83cc8162a)

Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Fix included in openstack/nova 19.0.2

This issue was fixed in the openstack/nova 19.0.2 release.

Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Related fix proposed to nova (master)

Related fix proposed to branch: master
Review: https://review.opendev.org/676022

Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Fix included in openstack/nova 20.0.0.0rc1

This issue was fixed in the openstack/nova 20.0.0.0rc1 release candidate.

Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Related fix proposed to nova (master)

Related fix proposed to branch: master
Review: https://review.opendev.org/695220

Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Change abandoned on nova (master)

Change abandoned by Matt Riedemann (<email address hidden>) on branch: master
Review: https://review.opendev.org/676022
Reason: I'm just going to drop this backportable workaround option. If some really needed this we could think about it as a stable-only change but this is a really latent bug that not many have cared much about fixing so not a high priority to backport and introduce the complexity that this brings. I'll drop this and focus on the master-only traits-based solution in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/695220/.

Revision history for this message
OpenStack Infra (hudson-openstack) wrote : Related fix merged to nova (master)

Reviewed: https://review.opendev.org/695220
Committed: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/commit/?id=4921e822e73383af0c8da4c5e3acfaa021eafe68
Submitter: Zuul
Branch: master

commit 4921e822e73383af0c8da4c5e3acfaa021eafe68
Author: Matt Riedemann <email address hidden>
Date: Wed Nov 20 10:27:18 2019 -0500

    Use COMPUTE_SAME_HOST_COLD_MIGRATE trait during migrate

    This uses the COMPUTE_SAME_HOST_COLD_MIGRATE trait in the API during a
    cold migration to filter out hosts that cannot support same-host cold
    migration, which is all of them except for the hosts using the vCenter
    driver.

    For any nodes that do not report the trait, we won't know if they don't
    because they don't support it or if they are not new enough to report
    it, so the API has a service version check and will fallback to old
    behavior using the config if the node is old. That compat code can be
    removed in the next release.

    As a result of this the FakeDriver capabilities are updated so the
    FakeDriver no longer supports same-host cold migration and a new fake
    driver is added to support that scenario for any tests that need it.

    Change-Id: I7a4b951f3ab324c666ab924e6003d24cc8e539f5
    Closes-Bug: #1748697
    Related-Bug: #1811235

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.