Unable to retrieve offline patron registration form

Bug #1784722 reported by Kathy Lussier
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Evergreen
New
High
Unassigned

Bug Description

Evergreen version: master, as of 7/31/18

I continue to have trouble retrieving the offline patron registration interface, as previously described in bug 1755220. I am able to retrieve it on the MassLNC community demo server, which was updated with 3.1.4 last week, but I can't retrieve it on a VM running a clean install of master with no additional customizations or branches.

I see the following in the Console when I first retrieve the offline interface in master:

vendor.bundle.js:6 ReferenceError: q is not defined
    at offline.js:851
    at Array.filter (<anonymous>)
    at offline.js:850
    at Object.o [as forEach] (vendor.bundle.js:6)
    at offline.js:849
    at u (vendor.bundle.js:6)
    at vendor.bundle.js:6
    at h.$digest (vendor.bundle.js:6)
    at vendor.bundle.js:6
    at r (vendor.bundle.js:6) "Possibly unhandled rejection: {}"

There are some other errors that show in the Console, but those also appear on the 3.1.4 system that is behaving as expected.

When I click the tab to register a patron, the progress bar hangs, and the form never appears.

Revision history for this message
Bill Erickson (berick) wrote :

This got in my way working on bug #1775719. I pushed a fix to that branch, then forgot about it. The fix is trivial if this bug needs to be repaired first:

@@ -847,7 +841,7 @@ function($routeProvider , $locationProvider , $compileProvider) {
                         return egLovefield.reconstituteList('asva');
                     }).then(function() {
                         angular.forEach(egCore.env.asv.list, function (s) {
- s.questions( egCore.env.asva.list.filter( function (a) {
+ s.questions( egCore.env.asvq.list.filter( function (q) {

Revision history for this message
Kathy Lussier (klussier) wrote :

I was planning to look at bug 1775719 this week, so I think we can wait for that branch to go in. I'll mark this one as a duplicate.

Thanks Bill!

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.