Please update mono to 1.2.6

Bug #177912 reported by zeroflag
6
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
monodevelop
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
mono (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Wishlist
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort

Bug Description

Binary package hint: mono

There's a new upstream bugfix release, 1.2.6. Would be nice to have it in the repositories.

Revision history for this message
Jérôme Guelfucci (jerome-guelfucci-deactivatedaccount) wrote : Re: mono needs update

Thank you for your bug report. I removed the "NOW!" from the bug title, as there is no need to threaten developpers to get something, it's often more productive to say something like "please" or "I would appreciate if...". Thank you.

Changed in mono:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
Revision history for this message
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu) wrote :

Closing the monodevelop task, it's unrelated.

We actually have 1.2.5, but will update to 1.2.6.

Changed in monodevelop:
status: New → Invalid
description: updated
Changed in mono:
status: New → Triaged
Revision history for this message
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu) wrote :

And JFI, 1.2.6 was released one week ago. From your initial description, it looks like if it was released a year ago.

I'll surely look into this.

Changed in mono:
assignee: nobody → pochu
Revision history for this message
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu) wrote :

woops. That should have read YFI.

Revision history for this message
zeroflag (zeroflag) wrote :

I think that should have read FYI, and not http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=YFI - at least I hope so. ;)

btw, looked at 1.2.5 - it's only in hardy. and unless you suggest installing hardy, I'll have to live with 1.2.4 which is really, really old ("lupus: I fixed this issue months ago, but 1.2.4 is really ancient").

and sorry for the initial report, I tend to write bug reports when I'm annoyed by something...

Revision history for this message
Patrick McEvoy (patrickmcevoy) wrote :

So just to confirm. Is this unlikely to make it to Hardy? I am happy to help if that would increase the chances :)

Revision history for this message
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu) wrote : Re: [Bug 177912] Re: Please update mono to 1.2.6

zeroflag wrote:
> I think that should have read FYI, and not
> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=YFI - at least I hope so.
> ;)

Ouch! I need to buy a new keyboard ;-) Of course I meant FYI.

>
> btw, looked at 1.2.5 - it's only in hardy. and unless you suggest
> installing hardy, I'll have to live with 1.2.4 which is really, really
> old ("lupus: I fixed this issue months ago, but 1.2.4 is really
> ancient").

Well, you are free to request a backport. See
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports in case you want to have 1.2.5
(or 1.2.6 when it's packaged, which will probably be this weekend) in a stable
release.

>
> and sorry for the initial report, I tend to write bug reports when I'm
> annoyed by something...

Don't worry. But try to calm down and thinking twice what you write before
clicking on "Submit". Because as Jérôme said, you will get more chances of your
request being done, and specially because some people (me for example) are just
volunteers, and we do this for fun. And there is no fun in somebody telling you
need to do something when in fact you don't. And those people will tend to
ignore those reports (and specially if they don't care about that package).

But you're welcome, I am sometimes a bit rude too. ;-) Although that's something
I need to /fix/

Cheers

Revision history for this message
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu) wrote :

Patrick: This will surely be in Hardy. It's already in Debian pkg-mono SVN, and I'll take it from there for Ubuntu.

Revision history for this message
Patrick McEvoy (patrickmcevoy) wrote :

Emilio: Excellent news! Thank you

Revision history for this message
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu) wrote :

1.2.6 is now in Debian unstable, and I've merged it. Waiting for review/sponsorship now. ETA - one day.

Changed in mono:
status: Triaged → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (pochu) wrote :
Download full text (3.8 KiB)

Mono 1.2.6 uploaded to Hardy:

mono (1.2.6+dfsg-1ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low

  * Merge with Debian, remaining Ubuntu changes:
    - debian/control:
      + Updated Maintainer Field.
      + Adjust Replaces for Ubuntu versions.
      + Added sparc and lpia to architectures.
      + Build-depend on libgda3-dev instead of libgda2-dev.
    - debian/patches/dont_check_proc_self_exe.dpatch:
      + Comment out code that checks /proc/self/exe so that
        mono will function on the Live CD.
    - debian/rules:
      + Symlink doc directories to avoid duplicate files, and remove the doc
        directories on upgrade for the now symlinked doc directories.
    - debian/shlibs.local:
      + Remove libgda3-dev build dependency, as it's in universe.

 -- Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <email address hidden> Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:16:29 +0100

mono (1.2.6+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * DFSG version of Mono 1.2.6
    + Deleted mcs/class/System.Web.Extensions/System.Web.Script.Serialization/
      JSON/* as those source files are licensed under Creative Commons
      Attribution 2.5 which is not DFSG-free.
  * New upstream release
    + Invoking GetFields on emitted type doesn't crash anymore, as seen with
      nemerle. (Closes: #452585)
  * debian/rules:
    + Updated MONO_API to 1.2.6
    + Enabled moonlight support in configure call.
    + Removed all "rm debian/tmp/usr/lib/mono/gac/"... calls, instead list
      libraries explicitly in .install files.
      (this is pretty error prone when upstream introduces new libraries and
       the rm list became way too long)
    + Copy various 1.0 manpages to 2.0 manpages for missing 2.0 manpages.
    + Remove +dfsg part in upstream version detection (UPVERSION variable).
  * debian/control:
    + Added new packages (mono-mcs/gmcs needed to be split as some parts of the
      runtime relies on the compiler, like the XmlSerializer class):
      - mono-mcs was split to: mono-1.0-devel and mono-1.0-service.
        (monolinker.exe is now shipped part of mono-1.0-devel, Closes: #443833)
      - mono-gmcs was split to: mono-2.0-devel, mono-2.0-service and
        mono-xbuild.
      - mono-smcs, containing the new compiler for moonlight/silverlight
        applications.
      - libmono-corlib2.1-cil and libmono-system2.1-cil, containing the
        moonlight/silverlight runtime libraries.
      - libmono-db2-1.0-cil, containing IBM DB2 database connector.
      - libmono-mozilla0.1-cil, containing the WebControl implementation using
        the Mozilla engine.
      - libmono-i18n1.0-cil and libmono-i18n2.0-cil, containing I18N libraries
        with code page definitions, moved from libmono-corlib{1,2}.0-cil.
      - prj2make-sharp, upstream moved distribution of prj2make-sharp to Mono.
    + libmono-corlib{1,2}.0-cil recommends libmono-i18n{1,2}.0-cil now.
    + Removed mono and mono-devel meta packages, as they are not useful for
      anyone.
  * debian/dh_clideps:
    + Synced from cli-common 0.5.3, needed for CLI 2.1 support.
  * debian/patches/00list:
    + Disabled armel_fix_configure_fpu_check.dpatch
      (FPU check is fixed upstream)
  * debian/pa...

Read more...

Changed in mono:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.