Just connected my cell-phone (Oneplus 3T) and.... gvfsd-mtp crashed with SIGSEGV

Bug #1759780 reported by Sam Freed
This bug report is a duplicate of:  Bug #1706097: gvfsd-mtp crashed with SIGSEGV. Edit Remove
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gvfs (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Just connected my cell-phone (Oneplus 3T) , just for charging (that's what the phone said)

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
Package: gvfs-backends 1.34.1-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-37.42-generic 4.13.13
Uname: Linux 4.13.0-37-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3.7
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: GNOME
Date: Thu Mar 29 10:05:20 2018
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-mtp
InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-03-16 (1838 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Release amd64 (20121017.5)
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/gvfs/gvfsd-mtp --spawner :1.22 /org/gtk/gvfs/exec_spaw/15
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7f45845045a9: mov 0x18(%rax),%rax
 PC (0x7f45845045a9) ok
 source "0x18(%rax)" (0x00000018) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%rax" ok
SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: gvfs
StacktraceTop:
 () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gvfs/libgvfsdaemon.so
 () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
 () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
 () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
 () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgio-2.0.so.0
Title: gvfsd-mtp crashed with SIGSEGV
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to artful on 2017-10-21 (158 days ago)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip fuse lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo

Revision history for this message
Sam Freed (sam-freed) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1706097, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Private → Public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.