deja-dup-monitor crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_once_slow()

Bug #1754155 reported by eddiebeer
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
deja-dup (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

 Error message just popped up, did not notice anything went wrong. Set the error to ignore for possible future events.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: deja-dup 37.1-1fakesync1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-10.11-generic 4.15.3
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-10-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.8-0ubuntu10
Architecture: amd64
CrashCounter: 1
CurrentDesktop: GNOME
Date: Wed Mar 7 20:48:08 2018
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/deja-dup/deja-dup-monitor
InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-09-28 (159 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Alpha amd64 (20170919)
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/deja-dup/deja-dup-monitor
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7f4b5d843588: movl $0x0,(%rax)
 PC (0x7f4b5d843588) ok
 source "$0x0" ok
 destination "(%rax)" (0xbbadbeef) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
SegvReason: writing unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: deja-dup
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0.so.18
 __pthread_once_slow (once_control=0x7f4b5daab02c, init_routine=0x7f4b54900490 <__once_proxy>) at pthread_once.c:116
 Gigacage::ensureGigacage() () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0.so.18
 bmalloc::Heap::Heap(bmalloc::HeapKind, std::lock_guard<bmalloc::StaticMutex>&) () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0.so.18
 bmalloc::PerProcess<bmalloc::PerHeapKind<bmalloc::Heap> >::getSlowCase() () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0.so.18
Title: deja-dup-monitor crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_once_slow()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-03-04 (3 days ago)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip gdm lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo vboxusers

Revision history for this message
eddiebeer (erwin-van-klinken) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1751460, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Private → Public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.