[MIR] fprintd
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
fprintd (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
[Availability]
Already in universe, in sync with debian.
Built for all supported architectures.
[Rationale]
Ubuntu desktop team wants to enable fingerprint lockscreen unlock support by default in GNOME installations and this includes the daemon to which gnome-shell and gnome-control-
[Security]
No known security issues.
Bug 1532264 is the only security-related bug here, but this doesn't seem to be a real thing. Also it's all about distro management, nothing related to upstream project.
https:/
https:/
[Quality assurance]
- The Ubuntu Desktop bugs team is subscribed.
https:/
https:/
https:/
No upstream tests or autopkgtests.
[Dependencies]
libfprint. See MIR bug #1745454
[Standards compliance]
The package meets the FHS and Debian Policy standards (4.1.1)
[Maintenance]
- Actively developed upstream. Last release was 0.8.0 in September
https:/
Changed in fprintd (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | Canonical Security Team (canonical-security) → Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) |
Changed in fprintd (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Fix Released |
Changed in fprintd (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Fix Released → New |
Changed in fprintd (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Fix Committed |
Looks generally good, some small things I need to get some clarification on:
[ required ] without- send-destinatio n (fprintd binary package). Maybe worth either: /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ fprintd/ +bug/1619329, which seems to touch multiple people and doesn't seem dealt with?
- There is some lintian warning on the policy file: dbus-policy-
* Check for a fix with upstream
* Override it in lintian with rationale
- Any suggestion on https:/
[ optional ]
- the package is using dh_install --fail-missing, which is good! It's deprecated though nowdays and should use dh_missing --fail-missing for listing missing files.
Otherwise, it looks good packaging and after a quick code scanning. I would like a security review ofc, due to the sensitivness of it.