Gateway_less_Fwd: route for compute node IP address is advertised with self as next-hop

Bug #1717636 reported by vivekananda shenoy
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Juniper Openstack
Status tracked in Trunk
R4.1
Fix Committed
Medium
Naveen N
Trunk
Fix Committed
Medium
Naveen N

Bug Description

172.16.3.11 & 172.16.4.11 are the control_data IP addresses of the 2 compute nodes in my setup.

CN advertises the below routes to JUNOS which JUNOS is marking as hidden. If I am not wrong this is because the route destination and next-hop is same.

Not sure if there is any specific reason to advertise these routes by CN to Underlay routers.

root@a2-qfx1# run show route receive-protocol bgp 172.16.2.11 hidden extensive

inet.0: 23 destinations, 25 routes (21 active, 0 holddown, 2 hidden)
  172.16.3.11/32 (1 entry, 0 announced)
     Accepted
     Nexthop: 172.16.3.11
     MED: 200
     AS path: 64512 ?

  172.16.4.11/32 (1 entry, 0 announced)
     Accepted
     Nexthop: 172.16.4.11
     MED: 200
     AS path: 64512 ?

:vxlan.inet.0: 13 destinations, 13 routes (13 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)

{master:0}[edit]
root@a2-qfx1#
-[ 0 controller1 1 compute1 2 compute2 3* LEAF1 4 LEAF2 5 S

Tags: vrouter
Nischal Sheth (nsheth)
Changed in juniperopenstack:
assignee: nobody → Naveen N (naveenn)
tags: added: vrouter
summary: - 4.1-FABRIC Routing : CN is advertising BGP route updates compute node
- control_data inerface IP as both route destination prefix as well as
- next-hop to Underlay routers/switches
+ 4.1-FABRIC Routing : route for compute node IP address is advertised
+ with self as next-hop
Nischal Sheth (nsheth)
summary: - 4.1-FABRIC Routing : route for compute node IP address is advertised
- with self as next-hop
+ Gateway_less_Fwd: route for compute node IP address is advertised with
+ self as next-hop
information type: Proprietary → Public
Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : [Review update] master

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/36870
Submitter: Naveen N (<email address hidden>)

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : [Review update] R4.1

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/36871
Submitter: Naveen N (<email address hidden>)

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote : A change has been merged

Reviewed: https://review.opencontrail.org/36871
Committed: http://github.com/Juniper/contrail-controller/commit/9e74c96256069a2052d41f6f72b3398dc47d2562
Submitter: Zuul (<email address hidden>)
Branch: R4.1

commit 9e74c96256069a2052d41f6f72b3398dc47d2562
Author: Naveen N <email address hidden>
Date: Thu Oct 26 16:19:29 2017 +0530

* Dont publish vhost IP route in __default__ VRF

Route and nexthop being the same would be rejected by router
hence dont publish the same route to control-node.

Change-Id: Icdb6bcdf1487d96d6942148fae0ffc8532efd746
Closes-bug: #1717636

Revision history for this message
OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f) wrote :

Reviewed: https://review.opencontrail.org/36870
Committed: http://github.com/Juniper/contrail-controller/commit/0383d7e76110b4fc9ea3582dda5ec3c97fb1e0a8
Submitter: Zuul (<email address hidden>)
Branch: master

commit 0383d7e76110b4fc9ea3582dda5ec3c97fb1e0a8
Author: Naveen N <email address hidden>
Date: Thu Oct 26 16:19:29 2017 +0530

* Dont publish vhost IP route in __default__ VRF

Route and nexthop being the same would be rejected by router
hence dont publish the same route to control-node.

Change-Id: Icdb6bcdf1487d96d6942148fae0ffc8532efd746
Closes-bug: #1717636

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.