Underlay: BMS type same as VRouter

[Suresh Akula]

From Analytics,

    prouter api shows the BMS and VRouter send same PRouterLinkEntry-->link_table --> type value

Vrouter payload:
link_table:[
  {
     remote_interface_name: "p514p1",
     local_interface_name: "xe-0/0/26",
     local_interface_index: 543,
     type: 2,
     remote_system_name: "5b8s33",
     remote_interface_index: 1
  }
],

BMS Payload:
link_table:[
  {
     remote_interface_name: "em0",
     local_interface_name: "xe-0/0/2.10",
     local_interface_index: 606,
     type: 2,
     remote_system_name: "bms-host-90-e2-ba-c5-76-2d",
      remote_interface_index: 1
  }
]

[OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f)]

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/34645
Submitter: Sundaresan Rajangam (<email address hidden>)

[OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f)]

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/34646
Submitter: Sundaresan Rajangam (<email address hidden>)

[OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f)]

Reviewed: https://review.opencontrail.org/34646
Committed: http://github.com/Juniper/contrail-controller/commit/bed64e0c749006a47c6d6379c095564a7634b61a
Submitter: Zuul (<email address hidden>)
Branch: master

commit bed64e0c749006a47c6d6379c095564a7634b61a
Author: Sundaresan Rajangam <email address hidden>
Date: Wed Aug 16 20:36:18 2017 -0700

Send correct type for BMS in PRouterLinkEntry UVE

At present, contrail-topology sends same type for BMS and VRouter in
PRouterLinkEntry UVE. Send appropriate type for VRouter and BMS as
defined in link.sandesh

Change-Id: I2e778d065df3a23de25806257e5f2397f6f7aa6b
Partial-Bug: #1711245

[OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f)]

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/34716
Submitter: Suresh Akula (<email address hidden>)

[OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f)]

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/34717
Submitter: Suresh Akula (<email address hidden>)

[OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f)]

Reviewed: https://review.opencontrail.org/34645
Committed: http://github.com/Juniper/contrail-controller/commit/2c57c58515abab14d71d049a8a3d26348433691a
Submitter: Zuul (<email address hidden>)
Branch: R4.0

commit 2c57c58515abab14d71d049a8a3d26348433691a
Author: Sundaresan Rajangam <email address hidden>
Date: Wed Aug 16 20:36:18 2017 -0700

Send correct type for BMS in PRouterLinkEntry UVE

At present, contrail-topology sends same type for BMS and VRouter in
PRouterLinkEntry UVE. Send appropriate type for VRouter and BMS as
defined in link.sandesh

Change-Id: I2e778d065df3a23de25806257e5f2397f6f7aa6b
Partial-Bug: #1711245

[OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f)]

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/34726
Submitter: Suresh Akula (<email address hidden>)

[OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f)]

Review in progress for https://review.opencontrail.org/34727
Submitter: Suresh Akula (<email address hidden>)

[Suresh Akula (surakula)]

Code is not merged to git repo

klash [9:56 PM]
It is almost definitely an unintended side-effect of upgrading zuul over the weekend. And likely a subtle issue. It may take us a couple of days, because this is not “routine CI flakiness”. This is something a bit more involved

[OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f)]

Reviewed: https://review.opencontrail.org/34716
Committed: http://github.com/Juniper/contrail-web-core/commit/116fd95c405e62e514524f45e11ffea0aac0df0d
Submitter: Zuul (<email address hidden>)
Branch: R4.0

commit 116fd95c405e62e514524f45e11ffea0aac0df0d
Author: Suresh Akula <email address hidden>
Date: Fri Aug 18 10:50:30 2017 -0700

Partial-Bug: #1711245

Physical Topology: As of now for all BMS nodes, we are showing same image as Virtual Machine image.

Change-Id: I8e41d763904f0daa11ea09d3814860ca4b20c4bf

[OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f)]

Reviewed: https://review.opencontrail.org/34727
Committed: http://github.com/Juniper/contrail-web-controller/commit/014ca021b837e6af3468fe0085a64f5c42e99b44
Submitter: Zuul (<email address hidden>)
Branch: master

commit 014ca021b837e6af3468fe0085a64f5c42e99b44
Author: Suresh Akula <email address hidden>
Date: Fri Aug 18 11:48:25 2017 -0700

Closed-Bug: #1711245

1. Fixed to show correct BMS image and also corresponding behavior to display BMS on topology.
2. Fixed Tooltip of BMS.
3. Currently we are hiding all tabs, as of now we don’t have any functionality to display Flows/Details for BMS.

Change-Id: I46d151e9d3f42f47592bd7b005f0be23e2b6dc12

[OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f)]

Reviewed: https://review.opencontrail.org/34717
Committed: http://github.com/Juniper/contrail-web-core/commit/321c8cd25994649e14f6eab2ce145797ac078c15
Submitter: Zuul (<email address hidden>)
Branch: master

commit 321c8cd25994649e14f6eab2ce145797ac078c15
Author: Suresh Akula <email address hidden>
Date: Fri Aug 18 10:50:30 2017 -0700

Partial-Bug: #1711245

Physical Topology: As of now for all BMS nodes, we are showing same image as Virtual Machine image.

Change-Id: I8e41d763904f0daa11ea09d3814860ca4b20c4bf

[OpenContrail Admin (ci-admin-f)]

Reviewed: https://review.opencontrail.org/34726
Committed: http://github.com/Juniper/contrail-web-controller/commit/73a56da2ec9fff10a23c288af091ac074ff37c78
Submitter: Zuul (<email address hidden>)
Branch: R4.0

commit 73a56da2ec9fff10a23c288af091ac074ff37c78
Author: Suresh Akula <email address hidden>
Date: Fri Aug 18 11:48:25 2017 -0700

Closed-Bug: #1711245

1. Fixed to show correct BMS image and also corresponding behavior to display BMS on topology.
2. Fixed Tooltip of BMS.
3. Currently we are hiding all tabs, as of now we don’t have any functionality to display Flows/Details for BMS.

Change-Id: I46d151e9d3f42f47592bd7b005f0be23e2b6dc12