Feature request - display record bucket as a shared list

Bug #1696157 reported by Christine Burns
32
This bug affects 6 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Evergreen
Confirmed
Wishlist
Unassigned

Bug Description

In previous versions of Evergreen you were able to use a bucket id to display a record bucket as a shared list. This no longer works. Now there is a field called btype. The value is either staff_client or bookbag where if the value is staff_client the bucket will not display in the OPAC.

In Evergreen 2.12 the "Add to My List" button was removed from the staff client catalogue. https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1629016

Staff now have no way to create shareable lists in the staff client.

Revision history for this message
Christine Burns (christine-burns) wrote :

This should also include the ability to display a copy bucket as a shared list

Revision history for this message
Jane Sandberg (sandbergja) wrote :

+1 to allowing buckets with btype=staff_client to display in the OPAC! Is this the line that prevents staff_client buckets from displaying in the OPAC? https://github.com/evergreen-library-system/Evergreen/blob/180e3329fcce010b58b9e9ca826f9c1757e091e3/Open-ILS/src/perlmods/lib/OpenILS/WWW/EGCatLoader/Search.pm#L281

tags: added: buckets opac
Changed in evergreen:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Jane Sandberg (sandbergja) wrote :

After poking at this a bit, it seems like I do not have enough understanding of the search code to accomplish this. Changing the line I mentioned in line #2 allows the bucket's name and description to show up in the OPAC, but does not allow the records in that bucket to show up. It seems like whoever tackles this would have to do some work on the container search filter here: https://github.com/evergreen-library-system/Evergreen/blob/6c0e0d5efaa90dd22468127d6e7d5bf87bdff6c1/Open-ILS/src/perlmods/lib/OpenILS/Application/Storage/Driver/Pg/QueryParser.pm#L725

My assumption would be that the following container.biblio_record_entry_buckets should be available in the OPAC, and that others should not. What do you think?
* pub=true AND
* btype is either staff_client or bookbag (not temporary or anything like that)

Elaine Hardy (ehardy)
tags: added: buckets-item buckets-record
tags: removed: buckets
Revision history for this message
Jennifer Pringle (jpringle-u) wrote :

Still a valid wishlist feature in 3.9 and beyond

tags: added: regression
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.