[R3.2] provisioning script for OOO does not bring up supervisor-database on controller

[Vedamurthy Joshi]

R3.2.2.0 Build 33

I was looking at a setup in one of the partner sites where they had installed R3.2.2.0-33 build newly with separate analytics and controller db roles
It seems they used a template from one of the below packages to bringup the cluster

[stack@hln2482p contrail]$ ls *puppet*
contrail-tripleo-puppet-3.2.2.0-33.el7.noarch.rpm puppet-contrail-3.2.2.0-33.el7.noarch.rpm
[stack@hln2482p contrail]$

It was seen that supervisor-database on the controller node was disabled and contrail-database-common packages were not installed. Thus contrail-database-nodemgr failed to run. The Contrail UI and contrail-status continued to report it as failed services. The cluster was fine though since cassandra( contrail-database) was running.

[Andrey Pavlov (apavlov-e)]

R4.0:

[heat-admin@overcloud-contrailcontroller-0 ~]$ sudo docker exec -it contrail-controller-container /bin/bash
root@overcloud-contrailcontroller-0(controller):/# contrail-status
== Contrail Control ==
supervisor-control: active
contrail-control active
contrail-control-nodemgr active
contrail-dns active
contrail-named active

== Contrail Config ==
supervisor-config: active
contrail-api:0 active
contrail-config-nodemgr active
contrail-device-manager active
contrail-schema active
contrail-svc-monitor active

== Contrail Web UI ==
supervisor-webui: active
contrail-webui active
contrail-webui-middleware active

== Contrail Database ==
contrail-database: active

root@overcloud-contrailcontroller-0(controller):/# yum info contrail-database-common
........
Installed Packages
Name : contrail-database-common
Arch : noarch
Version : 4.0.1.0
Release : 22.el7
Size : 0.0
Repo : installed
From repo : contrail-install-repo
Summary : Contrail Database Common
URL : http://www.juniper.net/
License : Commercial
Description : Contrail Package Requirements for Contrail Database Common

[Michael Henkel (mhenkel-3)]

this is intended:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/juniperopenstack/+bug/1664414