SM:R3.2build30:Provision does not start and get stuck with provision issued with errors in ssl keys - inconsistently seen

Bug #1673684 reported by sundarkh
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Juniper Openstack
Status tracked in Trunk
R3.2
Invalid
High
Dheeraj Gautam
Trunk
Invalid
High
Dheeraj Gautam

Bug Description

SM:R3.2build30:Provision does not start and get stuck with provision issued with errors in ssl keys - inconsistently seen

1) Install SM R3.2 build 30 Mitaka SM on the box; SM comes up successfully
2) Reimage the target with Ubuntu 14-4-5; Successfully re imaged
3) Initiate provision with contrail pkg Mitaka ; Observe that provision does not start and gets stuck with provision_issued with following error on syslog of the target

Mar 16 16:58:44 nodeh8 puppet-agent[1865]: Wrapped exception:

Mar 16 16:58:44 nodeh8 puppet-agent[1865]: File exists - /var/lib/puppet/state/graphs

Mar 16 16:58:44 nodeh8 puppet-agent[1865]: (/File[/var/lib/puppet/state/graphs]/ensure) change from absent to directory failed: Could not set 'directory' on ensure: File exists - /var/lib/puppet/state/graphs

Mar 16 16:58:44 nodeh8 puppet-agent[1881]: Could not prepare for execution: Got 1 failure(s) while initializing: File[/var/lib/puppet/lib]: change from absent to directory failed: Could not set 'directory' on ensure: File exists - /var/lib/puppet/lib

Mar 16 16:58:44 nodeh8 puppet-agent[1865]: Could not prepare for execution: Got 3 failure(s) while initializing: File[/var/lib/puppet/ssl/public_keys]: change from absent to directory failed: Could not set 'directory' on ensure: File exists - /var/lib/puppet/ssl/public_keys; File[/var/lib/puppet/ssl/certificate_requests]: change from absent to directory failed: Could not set 'directory' on ensure: File exists - /var/lib/puppet/ssl/certificate_requests; File[/var/lib/puppet/state/graphs]: change from absent to directory failed: Could not set 'directory' on ensure: File exists - /var/lib/puppet/state/graphs

4) Restart of the puppet agent resolves the issue and the provision kicks in

5) This issue is inconsistently reproducible

Jeba Paulaiyan (jebap)
Changed in juniperopenstack:
importance: Undecided → High
assignee: nobody → Dheeraj Gautam (dgautam)
Revision history for this message
Abhay Joshi (abhayj) wrote :

Need replication to look into.

Revision history for this message
Jeba Paulaiyan (jebap) wrote :
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.