AstroCalc - Misses Conjunction Events

Bug #1660219 reported by Jon Seamans
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Stellarium
Confirmed
Wishlist
Unassigned

Bug Description

When searching for conjunctions between Neptune and the Crab Nebula, I found AstroCalc missed events that have even smaller angular separations than one it did find

Example:
Max Separation = 0.5°
Search Times = 1/2017 to 1/2070

Note, all times are UT.

Single Solution found:
         2062-11-03 13:14, Separation = 4'29" (a correct solution)

Solutions missed:
         2062-8-22 ~9:42, Approximate Separation = 2'05"
         2063-6-14 ~14:26, Approximate Separation = 1'41"
         2064-2-5 ~14:31, Approximate Separation = 0'45"
         2064-4-1 ~14:31, Approximate Separation = 2'10"

I manually scanned Stellarium in 1-day increments to determine the missed solution.
Maybe the time increments in the AstroCalc algorithm are too course?

Thanks.

Tags: astrocalc
Revision history for this message
Jon Seamans (silvy5) wrote :

This "bug" is regarding AstroCalc Phenomena in v15.0 and v15.1

tags: added: astrocalc
Revision history for this message
Alexander Wolf (alexwolf) wrote :

Please try use not very wide range of dates ;)

Revision history for this message
Jon Seamans (silvy5) wrote :

Mmmm, I see I can reduce the search window (e.g. 2062 to 2065) and it does better, but interestingly I'm unable to extract 5 events in that 3-yr period - at most I can extract 2 in one time window. Being interested in long(er)-time prediction or historical searches, the utility unfortunately seems limited :( However, I can see that what I would like to do is computationally intensive at the least - I can put in on my wishlist anyway.

Changed in stellarium:
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
Revision history for this message
Alexander Wolf (alexwolf) wrote :

Current implementation of phenomena calculator uses iteration to finding a phenomena (with progressive changing of time step). This is better way what I find in the current environment, but I hope he can be improved in the future.

Changed in stellarium:
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Alexander Wolf (alexwolf) wrote :
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.