[9.x][update] contrail couldn't be deployed with the detach-murano-1.1.0 plugin

[Ruslan Khozinov]

I've deployed contrail, installed murano-detach plugin, tried to deploy and I've seen the next message:

Plugin detach-murano-1.1.0 is overlapping with plugin contrail-5.0.0 by introducing the same deployment task with id murano

[Ruslan Khozinov (rkhozinov)]

id | name |roles |
---+-------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------+
 9 | slave-09_compute_cinder |cinder, compute |
 4 | slave-03_contrail-controller_contrail-analytics |contrail-analytics, contrail-controller |
11 | Untitled (e5:08) |murano-node |
 2 | slave-02_contrail-controller |contrail-controller |
 7 | slave-08_controller |controller |
 1 | slave-01_contrail-controller |contrail-controller |
10 | Untitled (62:fa) |elasticsearch_kibana, influxdb_grafana |
12 | Untitled (68:8c) |murano-node |
 5 | slave-05_contrail-analytics-db |contrail-analytics-db |

[Illia Polliul (ipolliul)]

This task was intentionally added to Contrail plugin in order to make it compatible with Murano from core fuel. It does nothing more than moves this task later in the deployment graph, to teh moment where Neutron as actually ready and functioning.

So there's no option to universally fix this - if we remove task from Contrail plugin it will break Murano deployment with core fuel.

My propose is to remove the task from Murano plugin when deploying together with Contrail plugin.

[Denis Egorenko (degorenko)]

IMHO, such error should be resolved only in manual way. As i see, contrail plugin skips all base murano tasks. But in murano plugin we have our own murano tasks, which overlap base murano tasks.

So, i guess, this error can be fixed manually or somehow on contrail plugin side.

Also murano plugin has no compatibility with contrail on official docs.

[Roman Rufanov (rrufanov)]

resolving murano + contrail compatibility is not in scope for 9.2, please mark as invalid unless we have easy fix

[Maria Zlatkova (mzlatkova)]

A release note has been added to 9.2 known issues: https://review.fuel-infra.org/#/c/29483.