[SRU] New stable micro release 2.22

[Sergio Schvezov]

This is an SRU bug to release 2.22 of snapcraft which follows the guidelines defined in the wiki over at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SnapcraftUpdates

The list of bugs and features in this release are defined at https://launchpad.net/snapcraft/+milestone/2.22 and https://launchpad.net/snapcraft/+milestone/2.22

[Martin Pitt (pitti)]

Hello Sergio, or anyone else affected,

Accepted snapcraft into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapcraft/2.22+16.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed.Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

[Martin Pitt (pitti)]

Hello Sergio, or anyone else affected,

Accepted snapcraft into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapcraft/2.22 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed.Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

[Launchpad Janitor (janitor)]

This bug was fixed in the package snapcraft - 2.22+17.04

---------------
snapcraft (2.22+17.04) zesty; urgency=medium

  [ Sergio Schvezov ]
  * Support for gadget snaps (#886)
  * Remove license concepts (#880)
  * store: send snapcraft version in a header (#894)
  * New upstream release 2.22 (LP: #1640585)

  [ Bayard Randel ]
  * repo: cache apt related files (config, packages) in 'apt' parent
    directory. (#887)

  [ Kyle Fazzari ]
  * catkin plugin: python nodes require gcc/g++ too. (#881)

  [ Neal Gompa ]
  * sources: Add RPM source (#870)

  [ Stéphane Graber ]
  * Always respect go-buildtags (#888)
  * Allow for architecture-specific packages (#876)

 -- Sergio Schvezov <email address hidden> Thu, 10 Nov 2016 01:35:00 +0000

[Leo Arias (elopio)]

I tested this in xenial and yakkety:
Install snapcraft, snapcraft-examples and snapcraft parser. Enable -proposed. Upgrade the packages to 2.22.

Then I ran the following tests:

Build a gadget snap.
Run snapcraft --version.
Exploratory on store commands.
Build snaps and check that the cache is stored in $HOME/.cache/snapcraft/apt/
Build snaps again and check that the cache is used.
Build snaps with packages of a specific architecture.
Build a catkin snap and check that gcc and g++ are installed in the snap.
Build a go and check that the build tags are called for all the packages installed.
Build a snap using an rpm source.

I'm marking this as verified. Thanks pitti!

[Leo Arias (elopio)]

Marking verification failed because one change of syntax in 2.22 would prevent a new feature that we want to implement for multiarch. 2.22.1 is coming with that change reverted, and a following version will get it back with support for more things.

[Steve Langasek (vorlon)]

Hello Sergio, or anyone else affected,

Accepted snapcraft into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapcraft/2.22.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed.Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

[Steve Langasek (vorlon)]

Hello Sergio, or anyone else affected,

Accepted snapcraft into yakkety-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapcraft/2.22.1+16.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed.Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

[Leo Arias (elopio)]

I tested this in xenial and yakkety:
Install snapcraft, snapcraft-examples and snapcraft parser. Enable -proposed. Upgrade the packages to 2.22.1.

Then I checked that the reverted commit from 2.22 was actually removed and it wasn't causing weird problems. I also did a quick exploratory to check that the features already tested for 2.22 were still working.

I'm marking this as verified.
Thanks Steve!

[Launchpad Janitor (janitor)]

This bug was fixed in the package snapcraft - 2.22.1

---------------
snapcraft (2.22.1) xenial; urgency=medium

  * Revert "Allow for architecture-specific packages (#876)" (#898)
  * New upstream release 2.22.1 (LP: #1640585)

 -- Sergio Schvezov <email address hidden> Fri, 11 Nov 2016 19:28:41 +0000

[Steve Langasek (vorlon)]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for snapcraft has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

[Launchpad Janitor (janitor)]

This bug was fixed in the package snapcraft - 2.22.1+16.10

---------------
snapcraft (2.22.1+16.10) yakkety; urgency=medium

  * Revert "Allow for architecture-specific packages (#876)" (#898)
  * New upstream release 2.22.1 (LP: #1640585)

 -- Sergio Schvezov <email address hidden> Fri, 11 Nov 2016 19:28:41 +0000