screen display 0.92pre2 vs other viewers and 0.91
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Inkscape |
Invalid
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Hi Friends,
I've noticed a very obvious difference between how Inkscape 0.92pre2(beta) displays (at least 1) filter, compared to 0.91, and exported PNGs in Windows Photo Viewer (in Windows 7).
Please see the attached screenshots.
f1.png is what I see in 0.92pre2.
f2.png is what I see viewing exported PNG in Windows Photo Viewer.
f3.png is what I see in 0.91
The SVG file in question is also attached in the zip file.
I posted on the mailing list, but didn't get any response from developers, only a suggestion that developers need to address this problem. Thus this report.
I did learn recently that the native dpi for 0.92 is 96 (while previously it was always 90). I wonder if there's some option somewhere that I need to change?
I also know that different viewers can display the same image very differently, according to what the viewer can support and other features of the viewer. But it seems to me like Inkscape itself should provide the best display of images created with it.
Let me know if I can provide any additional info, files, screenshots, etc. This is with Windows 7, 64-bit, sp1 and Inkscape 0.91pre2(beta).
Thank you very much,
brynn
The display rendering quality settings in Inkscape 0.91 are known to be broken (ignored) as tracked in this earlier report: /bugs.launchpad .net/inkscape/ +bug/1512729
* Bug #1512729 “Filter effects and blur quality options broken”
https:/
Based on the provided screenshots, it appears that the reporter uses lower rendering quality settings than Inkscape's default ('average' ≠ 'default'). These lower quality settings are ignored in Inkscape 0.91 (see bug mentioned above): Inkscape 0.91 will always fall back to the default quality settings for on-canvas rendering of filter effects.
The mentioned bug was fixed a few months ago and is no longer happening in pre-release builds of Inkscape 0.92: the quality settings as explicitly chosen by the user in the preferences dialog are now again (and correctly) used for on-canvas rendering.
In the reporter's case - with what appear to be lower quality settings than the default (or fallback) values - the result is that rendering of filter effects on-canvas in Inkscape 0.92 appears with lower quality when compared to rendering in Inkscape 0.91.
Inkscape's default rendering quality settings:
A - Gaussian blur quality for display:
[x] Average quality
Filter effects quality for display:
[x] Better quality (slower)
B - The custom settings likely used by the reporter:
Gaussian blur quality for display:
[x] Average quality
Filter effects quality for display:
[x] Average quality