password generated before deployment if user does not set them via constraints.
Bug #1636987 reported by
Toure Dunnon
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
tripleo |
Invalid
|
Medium
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Use custom parameter constraint to identify such parameters, allowing the user to add a custom template which can specify that certain parameter that is generated. GUI can use this information too as it is embedded in plan (THT).
tags: | added: workflows |
description: | updated |
summary: |
- password-like parameters are automatically generated before deployment - if user does not set them + password generated before deployment if user does not set them via + constraints. |
description: | updated |
tags: | added: tripleo-heat-templates |
Changed in tripleo: | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
Changed in tripleo: | |
status: | Confirmed → Triaged |
milestone: | none → ocata-2 |
Changed in tripleo: | |
milestone: | ocata-2 → ocata-3 |
Changed in tripleo: | |
milestone: | ocata-3 → pike-1 |
Changed in tripleo: | |
milestone: | pike-1 → pike-2 |
Changed in tripleo: | |
assignee: | nobody → Adriano Petrich (apetrich) |
Changed in tripleo: | |
milestone: | pike-2 → pike-3 |
Changed in tripleo: | |
assignee: | Adriano Petrich (apetrich) → nobody |
Changed in tripleo: | |
milestone: | pike-3 → pike-rc1 |
Changed in tripleo: | |
milestone: | pike-rc1 → queens-1 |
To post a comment you must log in.
I'm a bit confused with the title and short description, this sounds similar to what we already do for passwords at the moment:
https:/ /github. com/openstack/ tripleo- common/ blob/93d87/ tripleo_ common/ constants. py#L55 /github. com/openstack/ tripleo- common/ blob/93d87/ tripleo_ common/ utils/passwords .py#L34
https:/
which get auto-generated and then used only if not set in a template/ environment.
Is this about moving this to the templates, so that we don't need to keep a hard-coded list anymore? Or about making the system more generic / customisable by the deployer? Thank you.