[doc] Support for images needs to be clarified
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAAS |
Invalid
|
Wishlist
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
There are several problems with the documentation around OS support @ https:/
CentOS support is built in from 2.0 so maas-image-builder is redundant in any version of the docs after that
The Pricing section on maas.io says the 'Free' tier allows custom images, which the above seems to give quite a wide definition of.
Overall the documentation and maas.io site need to a lot clearer about how users can use OSs other than Ubuntu on different MAAS versions, but a high level description seems to be:
MAAS 2.0 and higher: Ubuntu & CentOS built-in and Free, everything else available on a paid plan. Remove mention of maas-image-builder from docs
MAAS 1.7-1.9: Ubuntu built in, CentOS can be created with MAAS image builder, both Free. Everything else through a paid plan. Keep the docs but clarify that only CentOS can be built with maas-image-builder.
Changed in maas: | |
importance: | Undecided → Wishlist |
status: | New → Triaged |
milestone: | none → 2.2.0 |
summary: |
- Support for images needs to be clarified + [doc] Support for images needs to be clarified |
Changed in maas: | |
milestone: | 2.2.0 → 2.2.x |
Changed in maas: | |
milestone: | 2.2.x → next |
Changed in maas: | |
milestone: | next → none |
@Andres
I'm pretty sure this no longer applies.