Juju Charms Collection
swift-proxy package

kilo proxy-server.conf filter_factory value not as expected

Bug #1632028 reported by Ryan Beisner
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
swift-proxy (Juju Charms Collection)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

kilo proxy-server.conf filter_factory value not as expected

See the attached proxy-server.conf file from one of the running units.

As far as I can tell, the template should render this:
[filter:authtoken]
paste.filter_factory = keystonemiddleware.auth_token:filter_factory

But instead renders this:
[filter:authtoken]
paste.filter_factory = keystoneclient.middleware.auth_token:filter_factory

# Amulet test fails like so:
DEBUG:runner:2016-10-10 16:01:35,678 test_302_proxy_server_config DEBUG: Checking swift proxy-server config...
DEBUG:runner:2016-10-10 16:01:46,235 validate_config_data DEBUG: Validating config file data (filter:account-quotas in /etc/swift/proxy-server.conf on swift-proxy/0)...
DEBUG:runner:2016-10-10 16:01:47,227 validate_config_data DEBUG: Validating config file data (filter:authtoken in /etc/swift/proxy-server.conf on swift-proxy/0)...
DEBUG:runner:proxy-server config error: section [filter:authtoken] paste.filter_factory:keystoneclient.middleware.auth_token:filter_factory != expected paste.filter_factory:keystonemiddleware.auth_token:filter_factory
DEBUG:runner:Exit Code: 1

See the attached swift-proxy.conf from the unit.

Tags: uosci
Revision history for this message
Ryan Beisner (1chb1n) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Ryan Beisner (1chb1n) wrote :

Issue was related to misunderstanding of bundletester's "reset: False" functionality. It doesn't destroy/bootstrap as we had thought.

Changed in swift-proxy (Juju Charms Collection):
status: New → Invalid
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
Subscribing...

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.