(Ubuntu-GNOME, debconf passthrough) package shim-signed 1.17~15.10.1+0.8-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 128
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ubuntu GNOME |
New
|
High
|
Unassigned | ||
shim-signed (Ubuntu) |
Confirmed
|
High
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Installing updates - it failed during the installation of shim-signed
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.10
Package: shim-signed 1.17~15.
ProcVersionSign
Uname: Linux 4.2.0-41-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelMo
ApportVersion: 2.19.1-0ubuntu5
Architecture: amd64
BootEFIContents:
grub.cfg
grubx64.efi
MokManager.efi
shimx64.efi
Date: Thu Jul 21 20:35:42 2016
DuplicateSignature: package:
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 128
InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-04-08 (470 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-GNOME 15.04 "Vivid Vervet" - Beta amd64 (20150406)
RelatedPackageV
dpkg 1.18.2ubuntu5.1
apt 1.0.10.2ubuntu3
SourcePackage: shim-signed
Title: package shim-signed 1.17~15.
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
tags: | removed: need-duplicate-check |
summary: |
- package shim-signed 1.17~15.10.1+0.8-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: - subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status - 128 + (Ubuntu Gnome, debconf passthrough) package shim-signed + 1.17~15.10.1+0.8-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess + installed post-installation script returned error exit status 128 |
Changed in shim-signed (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Incomplete → New |
Changed in shim-signed (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → High |
summary: |
- (Ubuntu Gnome, debconf passthrough) package shim-signed + (Ubuntu-GNOME, debconf passthrough) package shim-signed 1.17~15.10.1+0.8-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 128 |
Changed in ubuntu-gnome: | |
importance: | Undecided → High |
The error in your logs is:
quit
Use of uninitialized value $reply in scalar chomp at /usr/share/ perl5/Debconf/ FrontEnd/ Passthrough. pm line 66, <GEN0> line 11. perl5/Debconf/ FrontEnd/ Passthrough. pm line 67, <GEN0> line 11. perl5/Debconf/ FrontEnd/ Passthrough. pm line 68, <GEN0> line 11. perl5/Debconf/ FrontEnd/ Passthrough. pm line 212, <GEN0> line 11. perl5/Debconf/ DbDriver/ Stack.pm line 111, <GEN0> line 11. perl5/Debconf/ FrontEnd/ Passthrough. pm line 66, <GEN0> line 11. perl5/Debconf/ FrontEnd/ Passthrough. pm line 67, <GEN0> line 11. perl5/Debconf/ FrontEnd/ Passthrough. pm line 68, <GEN0> line 11. perl5/Debconf/ Format/ 822.pm line 83, <GEN2> line 8. perl5/Debconf/ Format/ 822.pm line 84, <GEN2> line 8.
Use of uninitialized value $reply in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/share/
Use of uninitialized value $reply in split at /usr/share/
Use of uninitialized value $ret in string eq at /usr/share/
Use of uninitialized value $_[1] in join or string at /usr/share/
Use of uninitialized value $reply in scalar chomp at /usr/share/
Use of uninitialized value $reply in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/share/
Use of uninitialized value $reply in split at /usr/share/
Use of uninitialized value $val in substitution (s///) at /usr/share/
Use of uninitialized value $val in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/share/
This looks like the install "hung" from your perspective, but the debconf interface was waiting from input somewhere; and it never got it, possibly because of a ^C in the terminal.
What package manager frontend were you using for this upgrade? The apport-attached information doesn't show this, but only shows that aptdaemon was used as the backend.